an0n's comments on decentralized web

2019-02-14 22:56

RE: On the management of Gridcoin's social media and public image

There were no rules against downvoting content late, yet this is what you got stuck on instead of acknowledging the proposed tweet changes. It’s a fair issue to get stuck on. You went radio silent in the

$ 0.000

2

gridcoin

2019-02-11 20:48

RE: On the management of Gridcoin's social media and public image

That 'standard' broke down completely after a proposed Tweet which had 2 upvotes & hadn't been posted due to inactivity was then downvoted and rejected. Funny you should mention this. You’re twisting

$ 0.000

2

3

gridcoin

2019-02-11 20:43

RE: On the management of Gridcoin's social media and public image

You're right in some of your observations. My post is 10 pages long and it looks like I lacked clarity on a couple things that I overlooked in proofreading. I'll try to address them: Even at our peak,

$ 0.000

3

1

gridcoin

2019-02-11 17:36

RE: On the management of Gridcoin's social media and public image

Let's not conflate my opinion of your proposed Twitter management structure with my opinion of your role in it. I already knew that I disagreed with the proposal, so I voted "No" before posting

$ 0.000

2

gridcoin

2019-02-11 01:07

RE: On the management of Gridcoin's social media and public image

Well, you certainly caught me off guard there, Vortac. Here I was expecting a productive interaction about the criticisms raised; Not an outright condescending dismissal of every single thing I've taken

$ 0.000

3

2

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2019-02-10 18:35

RE: New Twitter contributors - community poll launched today!

Here's my very in-depth perspective on this proposal, and how it relates to our social media management in the bigger picture:

$ 0.000

4

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-08-08 03:26

RE: Reflecting on the 2018 BOINC Workshop in Oxford

Great job. You were well-spoken and represented this community in a good light. Thanks for doing this.

$ 0.928

6

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-07-15 18:36

RE: Gridcoin - Computational performance chart (PFLOPS)

Well done, that is awesome work! I think it's important that we know how our network is performing over time with that metric.

$ 0.026

2

1

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-07-02 19:37

RE: Gridcoin - State of the Network - 25 June 2018

@parejan Would you be okay with sharing the script you use to pull this data and compile these graphs with? I am interested in making my own charts (Not for use on Steemit).

$ 0.000

0

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-06-07 01:11

RE: CBR Proposal Completed -- What's Next?

You are more than welcome to contribute to the discussion thread I opened on Github. It seems to be a tough issue to address. So if you have any ideas, by all means feel free to share.

$ 0.000

1

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-06-06 23:25

RE: CBR Proposal Completed -- What's Next?

Up until a week ago, 75/25 was the leading option. Then, user Test1235 voted for 85/15 with 31 million shares, swaying this choice to the lead. Then, 2 days before the poll ends, user PhilD votes with

$ 0.000

4

7

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-05-26 21:51

RE: The real way to do what I originally intended for the Gridcoin greylist system that was my idea and project and my experience with the Gridcoin community and how its left a bad taste in my mouth , stolen ideas,projects and earnings

I downvoted because of the needless personal attacks, swearing, non-existent formatting and overall redundancy. If you remove those things, people might take your message a little more seriously. Plus,

$ 0.031

2

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-05-23 04:03

RE: FightAIDS@Home Update; Next stage in Phase 2

The infographic also states at the bottom that the data reflects the WCG network as of May 2013. 5 years ago. I'm sure there are more impressive numbers to be shown for 2018.

$ 0.000

0

2

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2018-01-22 04:37

RE: I think i found a relatively big problem in BOINC - Particularly for small projects . It can achieve data quorum from workunits from the same computer

I completely agree. If this is a legitimate exploit, giving it publicity before contacting devs or the project is reckless and puts the network at a greater risk. It's called responsible disclosure, look

$ 0.060

1

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2017-08-27 05:50

RE: Why I am Very Disappointed by the Upcoming V8 Removal of the Magnitude Component of the Gridcoin Staking Weight

So involve yourself in the development process Given the abundance of time, I'd love to. But lacking this, I'm left seeking summarizations of the bigger picture, from people like yourself who are much

$ 0.000

1

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2017-08-26 20:21

RE: Why I am Very Disappointed by the Upcoming V8 Removal of the Magnitude Component of the Gridcoin Staking Weight

I fully appreciate the need to patch severe security issues. However, I was not involved in any discussions on them, so my knowledge is somewhat limited. Was it not possible to fix these issues without

$ 0.000

1

2

an0n7m0us3

gridcoin

2017-08-26 06:11

RE: Why I am Very Disappointed by the Upcoming V8 Removal of the Magnitude Component of the Gridcoin Staking Weight

Regardless of the requirements for security, which are correctly being put first, this seems like huge change to make without community input. This is my main concern in moving to v8. Many polls have come

$ 0.032

3

6