Politicians should lead and accept responsibility for outcomes, rather than blame past leaders for every problem

NFA live session

haha fair point, InLeo doesn't get massive comment threads like that. I was thinking more of YouTube or Twitter where bearish crypto vids blow up with contrarian hype

Pretending everyone is bearish is simple, but comment sections on bearish posts tell a different story

BTC tends to form lows in February of midterm years, then produce countertrend rallies lasting a few weeks before dropping again. No amount of mental gymnastics will change how market cycles tend to work.

Social interest in crypto is still trending down, monetary policy remains restrictive, and macro headwinds persist into the first half of 2026.

Many who missed the top and drifted away from the four‑year cycle now seem to want the market to bail them out. Others who promoted altcoins for years hoping for alt season are now grasping for reasons

Why is it that every time someone joins live audio spaces to suggest midterm years are not great for BTC, the crowd quickly labels them a doomer? It's easy to pretend everyone is a bear, but a look at

Why do dozens of influencers post weekly, laughing and insisting BTC follows M2, ISM, or that this is a five-year cycle or supercycle?

If everyone is supposedly bearish, then: Why do videos expressing a bearish view attract hundreds of comments saying I can't wait for you to be wrong

Bears often sound insightful, bulls tend to make the money Still, bears can be right Every investor will go through multiple bear markets in a lifetime Acting as if they will never happen is ridiculous

The rate can be characterized as at the high end of neutral, or as mildly—perhaps modestly—restrictive; it sits roughly on the borderline between restrictive and not

yeah fair enough, online chatter's often just noise anyway

A permabull perspective is a legitimate preference. Dismissing others as "doomers" for realistically noting how midterm years typically affect Bitcoin is unfair.

Funny how the people who dismissed the BTC-to-2019 cycle comparison during the bull market are now leaning on that same 2019 comparison in the bear market Just another example of ignoring observations

Predicting toxic permabull emotions is 100x easier than predicting the markets

Picture declaring a bear market four months ago, then predicting BTC would rally in early March — supercycle believers would lose their minds and attacks would follow

Large incoming capital always has to consider downside risks, even if it's not a popular topic It's important to distinguish between those offering genuine market insight and simple price cheerleading

There is a difference between price hype and someone focused on managing market risk Price cheerleaders stay bullish, advise buying every dip, and mock anyone who mentions downside

Most influencers in crypto commentary are perma-bull price cheerleaders Nothing wrong with that — over the long run, bears can sound smart while bulls make money