uso bot, mais francamente, suas proposta parecem menos agrssivas e assimilaveis, o quetsante me parece muito custoso

Their willingness to collaborate has already proven true in the prohibition of the modern format, where bots migrated to the wild almost immediately after the proposal was promulgated.

We would know how many SPS and SplinterLands assets registered bots have and their real impact on the game economy.

With the registration of bots we would know more clearly how to maneuver the shares so as not to lead a large number of investors to dump SPS and cards on the market in order to exit quickly.

Me too, I'm a player with 11k sps bet, I got into the game 2 years ago firmly and made a Chaos deck, since then I've lost 80% of the value of my cards, and we're still here. There is no reward available

I believe that if there was no fee to create 2kDEC tournaments and if the prizes came from each player's registration fees and not added by the host, or rather that both event models would be possible.

perfect I agree 100%

Do you want to add bots now after banning bots from players? of the license, they are managing to put an end to the game. stop inventing fashion, and improve the base of the game that new players come,

Do you want to add bots now after banning bots from players? of the license, they are managing to put an end to the game. stop inventing fashion, and improve the base of the game that new players come,

quanto mais taxas menos vende

please focus on the game environment, improve the matches, create animation interactions during the rounds. stuff like that instead of playing FED

The idea that the DAO is able to stabilize price by buying or selling DEC makes as much sense as a central bank stabilizing a fiat currency. Maybe they can focus on developing the game environment instead

I think SplinterLands has to attract people, we need players and new money for the game and for what has been here for years. And let the SplinterLands team know that this is the last opportunity and chance,

I'm only in favor if: The value is in dollar equivalent (x) and not in fixed SPS, And this value received must also be less than the value of the Book of spells, which gives the "right" to play

I'm only in favor if: The value is in dollars, not in SPS, And this value received must also be less than the value of the Book of spells, which would give the "right" to win

I'm only in favor if: The value is in dollar equivalent (x) and not in fixed SPS, And this value received must also be less than the value of the Book of spells, which gives the "right" to play

I can't understand why players consider bots to be a problem, think friend. what governs this game are strategies, combination of cards, observation of the opponent's previous battles, mastery over the