A 13-block reorg reverted those invalid transactions — they won't be included in the main chain All valid transactions from that period remain unaffected The bug is fully patched and the network is operating

A zero-day vulnerability triggered a DoS that affected major mining pools Mining nodes that weren't updated accepted an invalid MWEB transaction, enabling peg-outs to third-party DEXs

Litecoin update 👇

Trading venues for LTC are recommended to audit transactions and holdings — many double spend transactions have been observed

NEAR Intents users will not be affected Any losses will be covered The exposure for NEAR Intents is around $600k

Double spend attack on the litecoin chain at NEAR — GCs are covering the loss and no user funds will be affected. Solid response. 600K is a lot of salami 🤌 Notifying trading venues can help stamp out

In that light, those calling for censorship look likely to be complicit in the actual crime 🤔

Consider the mindset of people demanding a protocol be censored. If the goal was to catch a criminal on the street, would they ask the city to switch off the CCTV cameras?

Native swaps are slower and costlier than bridges, but they avoid the failure mode where wrapped tokens end up unbacked. Using THORChain means never holding a promise someone else must keep

If a bridge is hacked, wrapped tokens can become worthless even though the holder did nothing wrong. THORChain swaps are atomic: either the swap completes or a refund is issued. No worthless synthetics

No wrapped tokens — just two native transactions on different chains coordinated by consensus.

THORChain works differently. When swapping $ETH for $SOL, the ETH goes into a vault controlled by threshold signatures while SOL from a separate vault is sent to the recipient.

This is why bridges keep getting exploited. Wormhole lost $320M, Ronin lost $600M, Nomad lost $190M. The architecture requires perfect synchronization between the vault holding real assets and the contract

When bridging $ETH to Solana, the Ethereum sits in a vault while a wrapped token is minted on Solana. The holder keeps a promise that the bridge will release the real ETH on redemption.

Bridges don't move assets. They lock them and give an IOU

Every bridge creates synthetic risk. THORChain eliminates it. Native assets > Native swaps Mechanics are unclear sniff but maybe it has something to do with the pyramids

Yeah, I've got mine written down on paper and tucked away in a super dull spot. No digital copies, no chat logs, just old-school safe storage.

With the unique system in place, there's no seed or single key for @vultisig, leaving hackers with nothing to steal. The only Java causing concern is what's in the coffee cup ☕️ $vult

Using decentralized exchanges provides real Bitcoin, genuine trades, and true ownership. Why is this concept difficult to grasp? #BetterThanCEX

CEX users often misunderstand: Bitcoin held there is actually an IOU Trades there are just entries in a database Keys are merely promises, not ownership