This is a concept I have been challenged to get across to my significant other for years now. Every time we face hardships, she gets depressed and can't grasp why I don't let things get to me as she does.

The idea that you can be governed, and free at the same time is the greatest fallacy statists buy into. They do not seem to realize that freedom and external governance are mutually exclusive, and that

The only area I have ever disagreed with you @larkenrose is when we were using differing definitions of Ownership.... In regards to rightful property ownership..... LOL

I think they would dwindle and die out over time seeing how things work outside their plantation.

@larkenrose in the interest of Voluntaryism, we should also allow for those who just cannot adjust to real freedom to have a state or a few states around the world, so long as they don't aggress against

You WONDER? I, for one, am sure that is the case.

Thank you for another great writing!

Actually seen this one time before, you need to post it here as it's own post and get some monetization for that shit. Its dope af, and all to true.

Too far south for me to make it... But I look foreward to the video. I will do what I can to help promote it. Got a link to prior video?

Where exactly in nor cal are you shooting, and do you require professional headshot or will a well done amateur pic suffice?

That or as an edit to this post, you have to copy and paste url into post or reply body. If you don't already use another image hosting site. works pretty well.

You should verify by reposting this on fb, then linking fb post here, or uploading a pic of yourself holding a paper with steemit and the date, if you want more upvotes.... There is a very real possibility

So you believe that all but the lowest possible wage an employee will accept under the duress of not being able to meet their basic needs if they do not accept the employers terms, should go to enriching

Worse than stateism victimless crimes? Seriously? Say you initiate aggression and slap me when I have not done anything that constitutes aggression towards you, and I proceed to hand you an ass whooping,

I was refering to land "ownership" not possessions acquired by ones own labor or in voluntary exchanges for the products of ones labor.

You should verify by reposting this on fb, then linking fb post here, or uploading a pic of yourself holding a paper with steemit and the date, if you want more upvotes.... There is a very real possibility

I am one of the early promoters of CGM still rock the CGM symbol as my FB profile pic. In fact been involved since before the symbol was created!

Still ain't gettin no tree fiddy without verifying! Selfie holding sheet of paper saying steemit and date, upload to image hosting site and copy/paste url into steempost. Steemimg.com is easy enough to

The same way you prevent free individuals from refusing to be governed..... You can't. That said, the goal of most anarchism activists is to tear down the common acceptance of the idea that there can be

A voluntarily appointed ruler would definitely contradict anarchist ideals, as anarchy and all related anarchos based words means no rulers. You are confusing anarchy with Voluntaryism, and even Voluntaryism