Great question. Here's one thought: many people store their savings in USD. If they switched to using a different store of value, and bought USD only to repay debts, pay taxes, etc., demand for USD could

We don't want to distract from my fancy new shirt! Those were wired headphones with the cable removed, so I could never hear anything, anyway. Ha.

Learn more about Segwit's effect on transaction size:

If he stored it as bitcoin, then society had to serve him by mining the bitcoin that he bought, just as if he bought something else that is expensive to create.

If you're a current customer, one idea is to open a support ticket to ask if they are considering adding it.

Now I feel silly!

I suggest you subscribe to the YouTube channel! :) Here's the video:

Learn more about this subtle yet powerful bias on Wikipedia.

Learn more about the Bitcoin Cash Stress Test in Jonathan Toomim's excellent article.

ahmanik is the best commenters

Yes, I still stand by my prediction from last year.

An actual double-spend attack is indeed relatively rare, but I think there's still room for discussion on how to improve the trustworthiness of zero-conf transactions.

Bitcoin will never be the only consumer of electricity. Supply and demand work together to naturally regulate the price of goods in a marketplace, and that also applies to the energy market.

Thanks, I guess? lol

No, I don't think this hedge fund is focusing on ICO tokens.

Yes, it's an interesting choice. It does kind of make sense for their market basket to contain the coins they offer for trade. I'm more surprised to see ETC being added to GDAX.

These three chains (BTC, BCH, ETH) don't currently have PoS fees, actually.

Here's a post with a bit of conversation on the topic.

Great point. Thanks for the data.

We'll have to make a video to congratulate you, if you are right. :)