He spoke of glint which suggest these might be bots. I also don't know if it is possible to win say in champ with just a silver deck and keep on winning there.

Have already talked about the downfalls of this. It also doesn't encourage skill as as people will just cram the game tactics and just be sitting there with memorized line ups which is not possible with

is this going to apply to all the sets that follow is my question.

i think the they should have settled at the base PP to be the same as Chaos long before the cards were launched. now they are trying to make the rebellion stay expensive, this would also drive down more

thank you for the answer, maybe my question was not direct. I thought the number of archons are the same regardless of which level you are playing but now I see in that chart that the highest amount of

can you explain those available archons figures what do they represent ?

12 bomb attack at the begining of round 2 is massive an intresting card indeed

LOL i think you are part of the few that are having automatic wins. I think his message is clear , how is it anti GF am not understanding

imagine tourneys with only 7 participants out of 120 minimum. Even the guy creating these tourneys should have noticed. I see very less wild silver tourneys as well i do not understand the reasons behind

The DAO Manager is working. you have my vote

Try to understand the mechanics of the fly wheel. I think you can understand it better. For me i think it is beneficial to that camp who are trying to burn sps quickly as you will now need the ratio of

Yes that is the incentive which is the mechanism of the flywheel I supose I dont see it as an exploit because if the price of DEC falls below 1: 1005 dec then there will be no incetive to burn. Further

I agree, i think .5 is not enticing enough but am also thinking like we need to start burning lol

I think there is no one loosing and no one gaining here rather I just see that now you would need lesser amount of dec for you to be incentivized to burn because with the current proposal DEC should be

it is really a challenge however our spl team are not ready to solve it

Which was my view when I wrote this post. The fact of the matter is the card is not actually weak in my view. Just the discontent players are expecting to play the card more often of which the card was

Do you actually have data to prove that this card is underwhelming? In my view the card was designed like a monster and is not meant to be played as often but when its played in the right context it will

ok i see thanks for the clarifications.

But wont this minting in advance increase risks of exploits? just my thinking is if they are not minted in advance they wont be exploitable rather the buckets will be there but minted gradually into their

i dont think that is the case here , I own 1 but i dont have a ton of sps.@ clayboyn I thought Runi should be a card which can do what other cards can not do. like eg playing with it while being staked