Having given it more thought, I can't find any objective argument against how they did it, but subjectively it still somehow doesn't sit right. Maybe a reason will come to me at some later point, or maybe

I think ETH has a future if it can win the race of fixing its issues before another project overtakes it in adoption. Its first-mover advantage has given it a massive head start, but the competitors behind

I'm sorry you took offence at me quoting you; that was not my intention. It was intended to illustrate why I felt compelled to reply. As for the pub thing, I suppose we're just different people. I prefer

Without avatars, it's hard to keep track of who said what on Reddit, so you may have mixed up who it was that said TPS is irrelevant. It certainly wasn't me. I don't think it's irrelevant at all. In one

Just to avoid "disappearing into the shadows", I thought I'd respond here. If you read the actual thread, you'll see that I never claimed the things he says I claimed, especially not "Ethereum

I just want to add that LoMoStar also has a really good value proposition to the companies that want to promote themselves on it (and I'm not just talking about IPOs). Part of it is that the envelope cover

Do you have an explanation as to why a coin value in BTC also goes down when BTC dips. So assume there's a coin called ALT that's worth 0.0005 BTC. Let's also assume that BTC is at $10,000. That makes

I'm not sure I see the relevance of the article about NEO (under "more reading") to all this, but that was a great article and I'm very glad I read it.

There's a correction needed here: Tether had claimed last year that Friedman LLP successfully completed an audit of the company to ensure that Tether has the money to back the USDT tokens the company has

Yes, thank you. It hadn't occurred to me until someone pointed it out.