No shit fucktard. Trying to be a man? Look in the mirror, Ned's balls are still marked on your forehead retard. Don't come here playing the hero because no one is going to believe it, well apart from other

I don't remember throwing anything at you retard. Stop being offended by every fucking letter. This is not gay pride. How about you honor your word and keep your big nose out of people's way, it's not

Speak for yourself, I've never done that. In fact I have respectfully attempted to engage with Koreans on Steem and reason over some differences in opinion, despite the difficulties presented by the language

I tied it to the witness above Wasn't discussed before by yabapmatt. I believe my initial comment was to him retard. I can see that BT is doing the job of explaining it instead of others who just like

Going low? will go just a bit low. You replied to someone by making vague accusations that they are keeping people in the dark and implying that they have a responsibility to educate others Nice, the earth

I'm disagreeing. The Steem community is absolutely on the same page concerning the current events I think you are one of those people who sees 49/51, then call it a unanimity or same page. This has nothing

Sun took over the Steem chain easy with just a few millions. Oen server to run everything. I want to see him try the same thing on the Bitcoin chain. Then will try to compare the costs

the distribution of coins is still better on Steem than Bitcoin What do you mean exactly by distribution? people who are using the coin, people who are mining or getting or using the coin? those are different

Tyranny of the majority. Of course, you will never have a full unanimity, I don't see where I did mention the opposite thing. Even though having unanimity doesn't mean that the idea is good or dumb. I

Not to be argumentative, but I disagree that it still applies. No worries, it's always better than believing in something just because it feels good. Nobody was talking about the "masses" here.

Koreans are a part of the Steem community, you can't just ditch them out from the equation just because their interest doesn't aline with yours. If we are going to start dividing communities according

the difference is in the cost to carry out such an "attack". I agree. Even 1 person, as long as you have the resources, in both chains. Thank you,

Let’s start ... If you think @blocktrades is the first to talk about consensus mechanisms on this platform after reading a 2020 post, you are sadly mistaken. I like to keep things precise, if you are going

Binance Terms of Use: The perfect trap. They have the upper hand because they know how the law function. If people want to understand what Binance can do or not, they just need to know what the law allows

That "few of people" can be easily achieved on Steem than Bitcoin. That's my point. Think about it in terms of risk management for example.

You're implying that the witnesses have a responsibility to educate others, but they don't Completely, if witnesses represent the will of the community (as some may say), then it is up to them to make

I beg to differ, such consideration is important to anyone who wants to invest or build a new blockchain. If specific types of chains are more prone to the abuse of "transaction refusal" or other

The idea still applies. This post discusses many ideas, some people will read it and undressed some concepts, they will probably understand (especially the decisions) the whole situation even better now

No shit sherlock. Now the hard question: Why @blocktrades was the first to talk about it? Get it? and witness that only communicate with the community 1 time in 4 months is BS. and don't you dare start

I was speaking about the first version of "SegWit" which did not require a hard fork. The second one "SegWit2x" does, but wasn't pushed because of a lack of consensus and other technical