So there arent enough people here to give away a game too.. shame, artjedi surely if I could get back in contact. The missing features on this platform are annoying.

Working as intended, you'll get paid one day but right now do your internship so that spammers and already rich people can have their payday. Trickle down economics for the win.

The only way it would not be inflation is if the value of the market cap also doubled meaning each individual unit maintained its purchasing power.

Its not about how much wealth someone owns but what can be bought with a single unit. You may not suffer under the inflation but it is still inflation.

It was my intention but... well kids school fee's medical expenses and such. We gotta live in the real world sometimes.

I was trying to give some of my spares away as well. nothing so posh as Titan lords though.

You a bro man. Thanks.

Not all votes are equal. Rich/Powerful voters have more important vites.

The illusion of value.

Need some details, some mechanics a synopsis... something?

I tried to give my spare games away but only one person commented on my steemit post so... I supose only one person is going to get one of my extra games.

Pay it forward works in real world scenarios because we receive an immediate return on investment. Ignoring karma and whatever other spiritual thing you are into, and the possibility of pay it forward

Yeah, I hate that.

This isn't new. If you want your journalism to be legitimized and good quality you have to pay for it. If you want your journalism free and on demand you're going to have to accetp that you are the product

It would help but not resolve the main issue. Currently users are rewarded more to rewarding content creators with the highest rewards rather than best content.

Would steem fail? Perhaps though it depends on the required outcome. I'm fairly sure that the developers could walk away now with significant return on investment and count steemit as a massive success.

Free markets don't work in and of themselves. They have their place and purpose but are to simple and limited to function on a greater scale. Or they do work, but only for the people who have a

Can it be that simple. The mere act of existing bring you into conflict with others. I prefer the simple underlying law of 'don't be a dick' but I feel it unfairly labels men as the problem and I'd use

Anarchism and anarchists re not so simply defined. The word has been misused and misrepresented.

I think its important we don't attack the posts that are 'winning' unless they are purposely gaming the system. What we need is a system to uplift valuable content not punish general content.