All I'm not advocating writing off the justice & arbitration system completely. What I'd like to see is clear distinction between those two categories (as they serve different use cases) and applying

I think this could be very problematic. If arbitrators are voted, then whales have huge powers in the system because they can make sure there will be arbitrators who they prefer. No one should have more

Please note that qualifying all cases of alleged theft as worth being considered, you effectively put the justice system entirely in the hands of private organisations like ECAF, as BPs won't be able to

Yes, you're quite right, it's usually the victim who feels the need to contact the police. Maybe there are some thieves who do that, but usually not the clever ones, I guess.

OK, so in your terminology the thief got into a "disagreement" with the victim, then they contacted the arbitrator who assessed the evidence brought forward by the thief and the victim, and made

I wouldn't call it police. Police in that sense would imo be the bps, because it's them to carry out the orders. ECAF rather resembles the court of law. Nope, I'm sorry to say you are missinformed. Police

Yes, I'm aware of this video and it only proves my point. When you are a citizen of any country, you also agree to the constitution by choosing to live in that country and thus you are subject to its police

What is your assessment of early EOS abritration? Let's see what the word "abritration" actually means. the formal process of having an outside person, chosen by both sides to a disagreement,

Those pools are behaving perfectly and have a long track record to prove it. Furthermore the miners can quickly switch to other ones. I probably don't realise this but what you've described is the essence

Flagged for not citing the original source. I'll remove the flag once you add the source.

Sure, DPOS is more centralized than Casper, but… This statement is actually incorrect, if we consider the only rational definition of decentralization. For more details refer to this excellent post by

This is plagiarized content stolen from Dan Larimer's post:

Is this Telegram group publicly accessible or do I need to an invitation? If the latter, how do I get one?

Mi się wydaje że clou problemu jest w tym: czym jest świadomość? Jak na razie nauka jest w tym zakresie totalnie bezradna. Wszyscy wiemy że coś takiego jak świadomość istnieje ale nikt nie potrafi podać

Coś jak popieram, ale się z tym nie zgadzam? Jak najbardziej ma to sens. Cenna jest wymiana poglądów i możliwość usłyszenia argumentów przeciwnych.

Takie spamowanie nie będzie tu dobrze widziane. Pliz nie rób tego.

Brawo za ten temat. Podobnie jest w ogóle z całym pojęciem moralności. Człowiek nie skonfrontowany ze swoją ciemną stroną z definicji nie może być moralny. Bo moralność jest wyborem a nie koniecznością.

Niegłupi pomysł, sam myślałem o czymś podobnym. A umiałbyś to zakodować w formie smart-kontraktu? Jeśli tak to chętnie podejmę ten temat.

Mi wystarcza to: bogiem jest to co zawsze pozostanie poza zasięgiem naszego pojmowania.

...we still don't have full knowledge of the universe. Do you imply that there'll be time when we do? I don't think so.