Bloody genius, it feels so obvious now! Makes so much sense.

"or the user just pay the RAM used for his row in the smart contract?" Yes. This would have happened anyway once a user moves the tokens, however, if the airdropper doesn't want to pay that upfront

Comments on Article XV Likely yes. While network resources reserved by an inactive user should be freed for use, this Article may be too onerous for the emerging days of the network. We also don’t like

The existing code, auto to = to_acnts.find( value.symbol.name() ); if( to == to_acnts.end() ) { to_acnts.emplace( ram_payer, [&]( auto& a ){ a.balance = value; }); } else { to_acnts.modify( to,

In section 5 you've listed the command... ./cleos create account YOUR_ACCOUNT_NAME OWNER_PUB_KEY ACTIVE_PRIV_KEY ACTIVE_PRIV_KEY This should be the Active Public key, not the private.

Hahaha glad you like it, I might make a sequel to this which will go into the evils of fractional and fiat.

The first image is a Chestahedron if that's what you're referring too.

I've looked into it and love the benefits/security BitAUD holds over any UIA however the difficulty and risk with juggling the MPA as a gateway would cost a large chunk of energy and time which I think

Absolutely agree, it's pretty amazing how much BitShares is developed, just a few more missing pieces of the puzzle, polish and I think it will have much more adoption. Will definitely engage you if I've

Oh really? That's awesome! True, I'm hoping it will be considered along the same lines as traditional exchanges where they issue their own digital representations of fiat and crypto. Given I'm only issuing

I love reading these, it's nice to have all the info here in one place!

I think this is really good, however I'm getting a little confused, there's definitely no UIA's involved in the strategies you're suggesting are there?