Not sure why Curie's full node isn't there either: rpc.curiesteem.com

It was my mistake, and my decision to move on to a more suitable role (time-wise). Transparency has always been a goal which we strive for at Curie, and when a mistake is made, the more information about

It is with SSD based Swap, I think GTG still has his full on a 64gb/128gb server with the rest on SSD Swap IIRC and is still one of the most reliable RPC nodes (In my experience). In fact the blockchain

I understand the predicament, however next time try reaching out on Discord (you can find the link in the Curie channel in Steemit.chat), you'll find that people (especially communities) are much more

@Curie 's Witness/Seed has been updated, Cheers.

Thank you very much for such an awesome interview! I'm glad you're getting the word out about witness voting and hope I've shed a little more more light about the work we do at Curie, we don't often go

Someone push this comment up to the top, the Steem community needs to know who the person zeartul sold the account to is, as the poor behavior of the account needs to appropriately assign public

The whole point of paying curators is to give the entirety of Curie holdings back to the community, there is a large amount of infrastructure involved with operating Curie, and the main point is not to

Awesome, yeah I was thinking of adding some examples to the developer page, as the JS examples are fairly ambiguous right now for newer developers coming from different languages.

Exactly, it makes it even more difficult in terms of verification in that the blackjack games are run in PHP, due to the fact that we don't want people modifying their results for obvious reasons, and

Hey Luke thank you very much for the reply, I recommend anyone to use an alternative account if they have any doubts about the site (its in the about section although maybe I should include it in the post?),

Whilst muting is an option, and it is something that everyone should do for most spam/crap content posters, in the cases of the extreme (like this), we should work together to reduce the bandwidth of the

Thanks for clarifying, there might have been a bit of a time-skip over on Steemd, but he is posting at the very limit (If you check his Steem profile, he's posting every 5 minutes), and it is much more

I agree that it still occurs, but by down voting we reduce the bandwidth of these users such that they physically cannot post as much every day which reduces the spam. I agree that the developers need

Everything that everyone has said here is incredibly crucial, and I know a lot of us 3rd party devs have built stuff on top of Steemit just for it to be usable for curation, etc. I do have a suggestion

Yes there are paid up vote services but typically these services do not yield more than they cost, also you're unlikely to go trending or get other rewards by using them to they're effectively moot points

As you pointed out everything is on the blockchain so nothing can be censored, flagging is more or less just disliking something. Downvoted for being contradictory and ridiculous conspiracy

Nope. Your content just sucks. I've never met anyone more arrogent and narcissistic, flagging isn't censoring people can still see your post, I just dislike it because you're full of shit and have no idea

No one gives a fuck about you because all you do is post shitty YouTube videos and low quality bullshit without reading Steemit's help section and community guidelines before joining. You don't get rewards

Absolutely fucking brilliant, I'm sure I speak for most of SteemSTEM in that we would love to see you over at SteemSTEM Chat sometime.