Don't forget, you can get 10 more free tokens if you add their link to your facebook and twitter page. More info:

little joke :)

Great F* news!

Yes, absolutely, but the problem is that elements of the right do not understand this. This is not a problem of the right as such, but a particular portion of it. I mean, I don't mind moral conservatives

No, communism is not a state. It is utopian, it never has been "a state." The sovereign Westphalian state dates back to the 17th century and is a historically, mostly Western governmental invention.

I think you misunderstand what dictatorship of the proletariat refers to. Please read on this, because it does not mean what you think it does. For the conceptual difference between communism and anarchism,

Communism as practised in the SU was state capitalism. This is far from a “funny move,” it is a historical, established fact. Communism as theorised by Plato, Marx, Fourier and others can't be conceptualised

"it's just the act of one person, Islam has nothing to do with it" so true! Thanks, you restored my faith in humanity (at least for the rest of the week!)!

BBC livestream

Socialism is not state-based, the state in socialist thought is an oppressive capitalist social relation. Under Fascism the state is the instrument for capital accumulation. There has never been socialism,

"The President Should Not Have to Respond to Every Mainstream Leading News Story" No, it his (stupid) choice. It is his own narcissism that compels him to react. Absolute idiot.

I have done the Portguese one as well. I will be doing the primotivo this September. Very much looking forward!

A fascist is a nationalist, a socialist is an internationalist. The two are in no way similar. The former adheres to state-centricism, the latter transgresses borders. Molinuex's argument is theoretically

Oh wow! I did not know! Thank you, I immediately pressed follow :) No, it is not my first language, but Pessoa wrote a lot of his poetry in English. He even wrote a guidebook in English to Lisbon :) Give

Thank you kindly

done

"Private property" for Marx refers to ownership in a capitalist society, ie. a society in which the modes of production are capitalist and surplus value defines what is owned.

I meant to say that we, ie. anyone that has a stake in this debate, need to have a conversation about where we want this to go. Maybe we can enforce direct democratic decisions about how many coins one

I think that is absolutely right, but it calls into question the politics of crypto. On the one hand, we have states attempting to (re)centralise and, on the other hand, we have the original objective