Login
Discover
Waves
Decks
Plus
Login
Signup
mb666bm
@mb666bm
25
Followers
21
Following
1
Resource Credits
Available
Used
Created
2017-12-24 19:42
RSS Feed
Subscribe
Comments
Blog
Posts
Comments
Communities
Wallet
mb666bm
bitcoin
2017-12-31 09:54
RE: Bitcoin (BTC) Evening Update: Too Many Gloom & Doomers!
Hello and thank you @haejin for your work and inspiration. Last year right after new year, BTC dropped a lot. Back then it was said that this was "marking profits" from whales so that they do
$ 0.000
0
mb666bm
bitcoin
2017-12-30 08:01
RE: STOX (STX) Shows Bullish Upside Potential for Both STX/USD and STX/BTC...Check Out this Analysis!!
You tried looking up anyone to see if you find any info about those ppl, where they worked before ? For every "real" company, ppl are posting their Linkedin. Not even 1 person can be found on
$ 0.000
0
1
mb666bm
bitcoin
2017-12-29 23:44
RE: STOX (STX) Shows Bullish Upside Potential for Both STX/USD and STX/BTC...Check Out this Analysis!!
they kinda look like a scam. team is like nonexistant. you can't find any information about them.
$ 0.000
0
5
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-28 09:04
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
Why would you decline payout ?? We are in the real world here. People work and ppl get paid. I only came to steemit because of @haejin last week and so far i did not put any money, so he is only getting
$ 0.000
0
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 23:55
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
My friend ... this is not comunism ... that pool is there because of ppl who PUT MONEY in steemit ... not because someone NEEDS MONEY for free noone is taking anything, that pool is there because someone
$ 0.000
2
2
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 21:01
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
Noone is "taking" anything .... @haejin supporters and followers VOTE ... and there are truely thousands of ppl interested in TA who VOTE his posts .... and this is pretty much it .... Noone
$ 0.000
2
4
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 18:18
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
i would have put a screenshow if it would have been possible but how much i made is not the issue ... JUST follow @haejin ..... and you will see yourself ....
$ 0.000
0
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 18:16
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
i made about 2k on this 12/24/2017 04:02:48 PM 12/22/2017 09:18:37 PM Limit Sell 0.00000154 145891.85625000 145891.85625000 0.00000153 0.22411177 12/22/2017 09:16:37 PM 12/22/2017 09:16:37 PM Limit Buy
$ 0.000
0
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 18:06
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
Indeed. I did not read anything worth my time here "so far". But i am still new to steemit. And in case @haejin will return, will put serious money in my votes. Voting what makes you money is
$ 0.000
2
7
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 16:33
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
16k subscribers ... premium information ....
$ 0.000
0
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 16:30
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
I came because of a friend, who was told by another friend about the 1st class posts he was posting about coins. I never knew about steemit because of the ICO and the coin, but was never interested in
$ 0.000
1
8
mb666bm
berniesanders
2017-12-27 15:25
RE: @berniesanders vs. @haejin: 481 Accounts That Only Vote For @haejin - A blockchain investigation
So basicly you say 481 accounts from his aprox 7000 followers only voted him. Probably they are really those who came to steemit only because of him. I was curious why i did not find my own name on the
$ 0.028
6
50