The paradox issue of travelling back in time is easily solved if you accept the many worlds theory of quantum physics. For every event, from the most insignificantly small sub-atomic interaction to the

In those cases it is the government part of the alliance that has the authority to use force. Without the government partner the corporation cannot "legally" use force to coerce its customers.

I have to admit I don't fully understand the concept of a UBI by blockchain system and how it would eliminate government corruption from the process. I have been saying to those who will listen for many

Either you simply have more faith in government than I do, or you don't spend much of your time observing and discussing government. Government is brute force. Government is action backed by a gun. Giving

I bristle every time I hear our representatives in government referred to as our leaders. I don't vote for leaders, the Constitution doesn't call for leaders. We elect representatives to do our bidding

Why should anyone want to take any steps towards universal basic income? It will further enhance the power of corrupt government over our lives, make us all more dependant on those corrupt politicians,

Or, we could just follow the Constitution, respect and adhere to its limits on the powers and authority of the federal government and eliminate almost all of that spending without having to replace it

Here's an article debunking the idea the government is responsible for the I Phone. You should really enjoy it because they mention you by name. Well, you might not enjoy it, because they point out that

You seem angry. A sign you don't deal well with differing opinions, I guess. As for real world facts, you do realize you are using Nancy Pelosi's argument that government is responsible for the I Phone,

You miss the point, I think. The basic income crowd isn't looking to enhance your return on investment. Read their stuff, they say right up front they want those with more money to invest knowing full

It couldn't have been faked with the technology of the time.

Bingo!! Ding ding ding... we have a winner.

Actually it is people of your mind set who have changed what began as the type of society I prefer. There are plenty of statist governments to choose from all over the world, but there were no alternatives

Basic income, when coerced through government is socialism. You don't have to like it, but its true. Its the very definition of socialism. Just because you don't like, and maybe cannot understand my answer

Why must it be universal?

Are you a participant in this group? And, if voluntary groups are able to accomplish the goal why use the violent force of government to coerce something that can be done without the use of force?

The key point in your example of digging a well is the voluntary offer of labor in return for an agreement by the participants. What's missing? Force. Coercion. Government. I would love to know how many

If this is such a good idea why aren't the supporters of the program forming and operating voluntary associations to achieve this goal? Nothing stops them from doing it and they would get all the wonderful

Your question is about giving control of the economy to the government to address the issue of technological unemployment. I addressed that. I prefer liberty and free markets, you are a socialist who prefers

Ha ha, nice try. I did exactly address your question. Apparently you have no counter to present so instead you attempt to make it seem my response was somehow a swing and a miss. You want to empower