this is a really good idea, so most likely it will not pass the voting. you must remember that the people voting are in aggregate regressing towards an average, so any exceptional features that made the

so is that a 5% fee written in a weird way or basically 0%? if you have a token paired between multiple other things that change in value, the swap fees are the only mitigation to the constant decay of

2000 commons as an upper bound is nothing. There's like 8 million of each of the recent reward commons, 125k of their gold foils, millions of each rare, etc. and that's before even considering other sets

It all sounds good other than lands using only '5' monsters each. That number to me doesn't sound future-proof, at all. I suggest 999999999 with diminishing returns. Posted using Splintertalk

"we want to build a game that is traditional" - 0/10 'soulbound' reward cards are lame. The only decent idea I've heard related to that is burning a rarity-based fractional amount of vouchers

So, as much as I enjoy alluding to the whole AI mirror force retribution thing, I do think it's worth setting that aside for long enough to mention that I sincerely appreciate the effort involved in being

next question - "what actually is the queen system?"

You could tell people exactly what hit them, and they'll still never know.

all images courtesy of alphacore via [REDACTED]+GPT+D2/MJ/SD but wait... there's more

Programming with seemingly random hive/discord posts? Hey, you might be onto something there.

Realistically there are many forms of aggregated intelligence in the same way that there are many forms of artificial intelligence (and the two could even be considered the same from a certain perspective),