to have a stake-weighted vote in this matter is a terrible idea. as of now i have counted roughly 70m sps votes by the top 20 participants. 70m out of 95m total. the issue is, these few guys are most likely

i support bringing back the leagues. it will give players a much more tournament like experience in which they can only face a certain deck of cards with certain abilities within their league limits. the

just to clarify. this proposal refers to the upcomming rebellion and future reward sets to be unlockable from the point of release?

Soulbound and unlockable for a DEC fee from the start of release would be my prefered option but its not on the list to vote for. or is this option already covered by proposal #159? in that case i dont

thanks so much for putting up this new proposal. it sounds very good to me and will have my vote. just a few things: "permit" sounds beaurocratic and exclusive. maybe the good old "season

id like to share my perspective as a botfarm operator. currently i am running 1350 bots on a 4 day cycle and id like to see the system change in a way that it is not profitable anymore to let the botfarm

i see it as bronko. it would only work, if we go to the old system in wild with locked leagues and reward penalties for low level cards. back then when we had the old system we saw tens of thousends bots

ke for SPS only, not glint rewards there are saleaeble items in the glint shop. this could be exploited by bots and is my main concern.

answering some comments: @tjdemigod "Again, this still affects actual players with smaller alt account/s..." i think this will even out. Yes, it will hurt players with small collection cos they

"by cutting their abilities in winning rewards." that would include glint rewards.

hello everyone! we are currently working on an update for DAO proposal #57 as it was suggested by matt in the recent townhall. (ts: 41:33) the the final text for the new proposal is still to be found,