Digging into people's personal affairs, whether on a blockchain or otherwise, may well involve facts, but that doesn't make it invasive and inappropriate, especially when no strong or ultimately meaningful

It nevertheless doesn't change the fact that your suggestion of the notion of @ozchartart being a random poster who got lucky is a straw man. I don't believe anyone has suggested it. I actually said "got

also ozchart has a reply as well

I have flagged this post as this is a witch-hunt that has no factual basis, only misguided speculation. The following is my explanation for why. one more thing -- this is absolutely false. With the exception

People who succeed in a system based on voting will often if not usually have some in-built source of voting support. It is absurd to suggest otherwise. to me this answer you gave to @kevinwong (about

Okay I misundertood. Nevertheless, it still appears to me you making overly-strong factual claims in your original post. That is not a good sign for witch-hunt post. With the exception of incorrectly assuming

The members you call into question are real and different people, and arguing that "account creation" gives some sort of link to identity is a misnomer: account creation can be used to make an

yeah, but on a blockchain there's not a ton they can do about it... it does look like one of the early miners, but i can't see any connected accounts that are still active...

Everything i said was absolutely provably true From OP: I was talking about the comment @berniesanders flagged. I said however, there were no lies in my comment. Everything i said was absolutely provably

Of course, that is your right. However there were no lies in my comment. Everything i said was absolutely provably true. Including the fact that him being an alt account was a possible interpretation of

I specifically stated in the comments to this post that this was an alt account for my main account @sigmajin. link to comment .. so I guess this account is more of a prop player than a shill. I had originally

incidentally, it seems to me that you wish to have your cake and eat it too. On one hand, if someone criticizes the quality of the work of one of your 'friends', you flag them because they must have ulterior

it seems like it would be hard to implement on a blockchain... yours network had a similar idea, and it seemed to me tha tthey were just inviting people to work around it. I normally try not to pimp my

it looks like the account is inactive and has been for some time. theres 600 that people just accidentally sent it sitting in its wallet.

of course. but the downvote says a lot about who @ozchartart really is and the justification behind downvoting him

those were two really interesting ones, since especially mibenkito had a lot of controversy around her. But when you add it all up, the amount of money thats gone to accounts with a direct link to one

I think privacy is really important, and i think you have every right to it. But you can't have your cake and eat it too. You can't say "yeah, it totally looks like I'm NGC on the blockchain but you

I want to make it clear that im not accusing you of any wrong doing. But right or wrong, there is a debate about NGC voting for OZ and it doesn't really seem like theyre strangers in the night (as most

However, (I love detective jobs ;)) what I found is @aizensou is connected to @bento @meiisheree and @mibenkito. Dude, you ruined my big reveal! I noticed the Aizen/bento/meiisheree/mibenkito thing too.