No communication coming from my end should be considered binding as I might have been under duress. To be certain about the provenance of the communication, confirmation coming from an overseas territory

(the actual divorce papers were served in 2017)

When sending email to various people, zero trust, everything may and will be used against me. Operating in the realm of trust, honesty, integrity has advantages. Too bad there is no such thing in legal

13th March 2019 19:25

I've found an interesting piece of news: Google "leeds man charged with terror offenses" and even on the page n-th of the results you'll find the same article. It is thanks to a situation similar

I would like to make a suitable arrangement so that I can fulfill the Court request.

Gaussian blur: 6.5px Mosaic filter: 12px It is a waste of effort to document evidence that way but what are the alternatives?

Finding balance. Really wish I could invest my energy into something semi-productive. Extinction Rebellion

I wanted to see Charlie Gard doing some burpees, breaking the world record at 851 per hour: Put his name into Google... In June, immediately after the High Court had ruled that artificial life support

Previous post on this subject. Not sure if I want to bother the court. Chances are they see me as a nuisance. It is in the interest of Justice to base Court judgments on the actual facts, truth, evidence,

Cannot use my name, as always blurring it: Only after I've sent the email noticed inconsistent capitalisation CAFCASS vs Cafcass in naming the attachments. I the content of the 00. Investigation - Cafcass

We can’t supply you with any information about calls you’ve received unless your request is supported by a court order. If you need this information with regard to a legal matter, but don’t have a court

Initially I thought my case is simple / straightforward and I will save money by being a litigant in person. (I was thinking it is better to spend that money on children instead) After some time I have

I really wish we were able to resolve the matters a year ago... ...as the time goes by, the layers of bullshit are piling up and I understand that I have ZERO CHANCE of disputing such statements. Truth,

The court process: Illustrate Demonstrate Indicate Showcase Presentation Appearance Allegations Concerns Thoughts Views None of these are present: Truth Facts Reality Proof Evidence Research Data Science

Initial Hearing: 20th November 2017 Cafcass Report 1: 24th January 2018 Hearing: 7th February 2018 Cafcass Report 2: 19th April 2018 Hearing: 3rd May 2018 Final Hearing: 21st August 2018 (as you can tell

...the trouble is they are not! They are drafted by a party and then there is no obligation for other party to review. HOLY FUACAMOLE At all times I will emphasize the keen willingness to reach an agreement