Dwan

IIRC first cap was 500 million USD, now down to ~100 million. That's a step in the right direction, but still too high. Why such a high cap? Post-DAO recommendations were to keep ICO caps below 10 million.

Care to list a few? I feel like I've watched most of the good ones already... Been waiting for this one for some time now

I'll keep saying it, we need separation of flagging and downvoting. Until then, people will keep demonizing downvoters, even if they're doing their jobs in redistributing wealth in a fair manner. Most

No! It's a lot worse to forget about it and expect SBD instead of SP than the opposite. You can very easily power up your SBD.

Exactly. Also, poker players don't make nearly as much as some people might think. If you did in fact have psychic abilities, it'd be much more profitable to share them with the world than to keep them

Alright I see your point. Might not make a huge difference per investor, but as a whole it does. IMO curators are also much more likely to keep their Steem powered up than authors, so it would make sense

I think you have the wrong idea here. Steem going down isn't the problem, the problem is that we let it go up too quickly. Here's what people need to understand: your blogs aren't worth what you're getting

I'd say close to 0% in both categories.

I'm pretty sure this was the case about a month ago. For at least a couple of weeks, @wang was making over 6k SP/week when he was still voting at 14 mins. Ever since he cut down on his upvote delay, the

Right, for a really low amount, you can rank well in "promoted" under most of your tags if they're not too general.

Ahh, nice. See, that's something I wanted to do just to see how the community handles this type of situation. If it gets any traction, this could end up being the most upvoted (with lowest payout/upvote

Ever tried the EnChroma glasses?

Good post Tim, I followed! I have a couple of technical comments/additions since this is very close to my field of research! Most objects reflect light but before that happens they adsorb part of the light

An interesting way of suggesting content would be to do it based on what was also recently upvoted by people who upvoted the post you're reading. It could be stake based.

I've got some posts/ideas that require an introduction to Fourier transforms. I wasn't sure how to best introduce them, now I have something to link to!

I'm very excited about that project. The consensus based market resolution system is something that will be used in a lot of decentralized applications if successful. Do you know how they deal with outcomes

Third one, statistical impossibility.

Pretty much! A mirror is purely specular reflection, so you end up with a perfect image of the object. If you had a wavy mirror, you'd get a wavy image. Now, imagine that you wanted to cancel out the effect

Can you elaborate on what's considered to be "high frequency posting" and why it's a negative thing?