26% is a pretty low level. If an author would want to take an easy route, I'm sure the level of assumed generative content would be considerably higher.

There are indeed some spectacular scenes in this Quentino movie with some awesome cast members. The part that takes place in the tavern is just Quentino geekery at its finest from a to z, having Fassbender

a dark, dirty, suffocating noir - a bang on description indeed. My review of "The Batman" can be seen here.

"Civil War" is quite specifically about US: the "what kind of American are you" question asked by a paramilitary soldier who shoots foreigners, the inclusion of Charlottesville, a president

Emma Stone is wild and the best thing about her is that she loves exploring on screen how far she can go with being wild while keeping it tasteful and creative. I also watched the Kinds of Kindness, which

Everyone in Hollywood is in hot water all the time; if you get spotlight in whatever capacity even for a moment, that's already a lot. I think it's been like that for quite some time now but no disruption

AI or not, the screenwriters will still have a competition. If anything, AI might add another layer of competition, let's tentatively call it how to train your model ...

Here's my prediction: paraphrasing the catchphrase: idea is king The more high quality noise and spam will get produced by AI, the more valuable an original and solid idea will become. So with that said,

I thoroughly agree with this: "the film enchants with some really gorgeous shots and applaudable direction for young Arkasha Stevenson, who has an eye for showing beauty within horror in an incredible

I loved how I got that feeling the filmmaker had made this movie with particular audience in mind. Most aspects are, as you point out, stripped to the bones, but at the same time there is a clear awareness

Always loved this film. This part: "Kutcher's disappearance down the rabbit hole of his fractured mind was a shocking star turn; by the end of the film, nothing was as it seemed, reflecting the

Yes, I agree about that feeling free sentiment with highways and such not having any real memorable part in this movie. All the focus seems to be on outlaw business, more material level of it, glossing

"Civil War" is a quality work I expected from Alex Garland. To me it always seemed it had something to do with the Guns n' Roses song. The movie is just packed with actors of that generation.

I think Paul Bettany's performance was the most impressive one by comparison. You can read my review of "The Da Vinci Code" at

I liked how the crime action in "Drive" was done differently than what you typically get in the big budget movies of this genre. I think it is important to note the fact "Drive" is

Thank you and skål!

Warcraft games had similar characters to LotR and other works by Tolkien from the very beginning. Blizzard wouldn't be able to use names from those works (copyright and everything) and sure had been developing

Whatever the budget, the series was a far cry from the trilogy of LotR movies. Apart from some decent actorship here and there, and sword skills, the series is a semi cartoon of epic and spectacular CGI.

I found it hilarious how the writers have managed to connect Anya Taylor-Joy's character to peaches in Furiosa. No less hilarious is the idea of growing peaches in Australian deserts. It's also quite

Started watching it right on the release day. Great production values, some solid characters and decent development of storylines imo, but the overarching plot, "the hero's journey" fails to