Now, this might be because I muted the video and skipped through reading the captions after the "epic" music and the repetition of the word "pseudoscience" got too annoying half way

Rather than do the obvious thing and point out how wildly inaccurate that model is to how things really work... do you people really think Australia is as big as the entire North American continent?

How can you justify putting One Punch Man Season 2 at number 1 when the production quality is such an immense downgrade from Season 1? And, more broadly, you're just giving what reads like the flap copy

That would only be true is you only saw one hemispherical section of the night sky per night. Obviously, the Earth is still rotating at night (or, however flat-Earthers explain how the stars move at night),

There are. They have. Hey, look, water curves when a force is acting on it It is and they do. Not sure about "perfectly", see 4, but what pattern are you expecting on a rotating sphere? Stars

Did you know? When you rotate 360 degrees, you end up facing the same direction!

lol, yeah, 'cause a map showing how big Liechtenstein is compared to Germany proves Europe isn't real. Great point, mister Wake M. Asses

The weight of the air molecules pulling it down towards Earth and the atmospheric pressure pushing it out into space is at equilibrium. I don't know what "vaulted" is supposed to mean here (what

Counterpoint: A common theory about what makes conspiracy theories popular is that believing in them makes people feel special and important, because they know something the sheep all around them don't.

Actually, the night sky was different thousands of years ago, and the astronomical significance of structures like stonehenge is something that has to be reconstructed by deducing what the night sky looked

You can determine the relative position between the ground you're standing on and an object in the sky by looking at it. That's enough to invalidate models that are clearly wrong about the relative position

Does anyone who's ever seen a sunrise or sunset actually believe this? And if so, how?

What extreme hatred? You're already distinguishing ridicule and frustration as separate things; is there even anything left after that? I mean, some people can get really fired up by that kind of frustration

So, here's the actual page for that map at the top of the post; the actual content of the article is in accordance with Betteridge's law of headlines. Obviously the main post here goes waaaay past the

Earth's bodies of water are indeed mostly level, which in a spherical frame of reference means the surface is the same distance from the centre of the Earth wherever you are. But if you want to try to

On both points, you're not addressing what I've actually said and are repeating the things I was addressing in my comment. I'm not going to repeat myself.

Of course they're similar, they're the exact same map projection. The mystery is why flat-Earthers would believe that an azimuthal equidistant projection of the allegedly fake globe would somehow be an

The fact that some guy taking a selfie on Mt. Everest used a fisheye lens is not exactly a devastating argument against the Earth being round - if some idiot used the photo as "proof the Earth is

Nobody thinks the dark side of the moon is caused by Earth's shadow. You're thinking of Lunar Eclipses.

Oh, I'm sorry, I thought we were talking about gravity.