Yes, remove glint for potions and soulbind the golds too. Keep things how they were.

Just a quickie, what are the Jackpots in the loot chests?

I agree. Always behind any idea that goes towards promoting ownership over renting, even if only in a small way. Instead of cards that are listed at under 1 DEC being cancelled at 60 days, I would suggest

Been asking for the number of voters info for a while. Where do you see this info please? Thanks.

I am a fan of simplicity. If the the target is to reduce Botfarms, as that is how I read the post, then we have that solution already in Modern. Lets just copy that standard and apply to both lanes. We

Yes for me in theory. Have always wanted to see ownership take a bigger part in the game. How to deploy not sure. Bots are supported by the rental market, there should be advantages to owning rather than

Would be in favor if It was offered alongside spellbook purchase. If account could only play modern whilst holding the 100 SPS. All rewards are kept but remain locked until account has 100 of its own SPS

I said this when we were going through the same fun and games with CL. Lets not change the past, but learn for the future. Rebellion and future releases all need to be released with this daily burn initiated

I feel this should not even be a vote. You are asking the majority of players to vote on an issue between the minority who are the main SPS holders. I would expect you to grow up and be able to clean your

Watching the vote on the anti-bot measures. Please please please add the number of individual voters in brackets alongside the the total SPS votes. Would give a better breakdown of the community votes.

The key to success in web3 is finding a way to make everyone want to stay. How to stop the skimmers coming in with no interest in the project, just what they can take from it. Its human nature to want

I requested SPL to implement the number of people voting stat in their votes, not for result but for clarity. But never happened.

Yes I agree. And the vote is interesting so far. Fewer people voting yes, but with more banked. And more people with little bank voting no. Clearly shows the demographic between those invested in supporting