Great suggestions. This sounds like really good advice on how to change any unwanted eating habits, not just meat.

Let me ask you, seriously, if you would be upset if your city was maintaining on city property a monument with the islamic crescent moon on it, but would not allow a monument with a christian cross to

First, it hasn't been banned. Second, the government can use candles and bells, but not if it is in a way that promotes religion. This isn't complicated. Your problem seems to be with the constitution.

You could say the same thing about the pentagram.

Are you seriously trying to argue that in this country the cross isn't a christian symbol? That is absurd. If that is the case, why wasn't the city willing to remove it?

The cross is obviously a christian symbol. And the government doesn't have free speech rights. Free speech is to protect the people from the government.

Please don't tag this garbage with the science tag.

The city is not being "blackmailed." There was an overtly religious symbol on city property. The city was asked to removed it. Instead, the city declared that area a "free speech zone"

I've dissected bullfrogs to examine them for parasites and it is amazing how much food some of them have in their stomachs. I've seen them with stomachs so distended from multiple crayfish carapaces that

Beautiful shot.

Thanks. Just kind of lucky that I figured it out since I'm not too familiar with moths in that region of the world. I was pretty sure it was in the Arctiinae subfamily, because I actually first thought

Looks like it might be a black-headed wasp moth, Eressa angustipenna.

Yep, their eyes are functional. They hang out under debris and leaf litter, but they also have to hunt and forage. They also have to migrate to bodies of water during breeding season.

I think it is some species of blow fly, but I could be wrong. If you try searching for blow flies in your region you might be able to identify it.

Great picture.

Great shot. It's beautiful.

So much nonsense.

Are you saying scientists have no data supporting global warming?

It's not a fallacy, and no one is saying "we see Y, therefore X is true." We are saying, if X is true we should expect to see Y. And we do that over and over and over again, for different

No one has ever said it did. Please answer my question, what is a line of DNA?