In my opinion, it seems it could be a very interesting project, but I do not see the need for having a new coin, Nectar, to make it work.

Apparently this ICO is backed by an established company with important customers, as read in their whitepaper: "Gravity4, Inc., through its subsidiary LydianCoin SG and its cryptocurrency, LydianCoin

My first impression is that COLU could be a good idea, and even it might be a serious ICO. However there are are many issues not explained in the site. The objective is for communities to issue local

When I read this, I expect to see how many ICO's they have organized and the results. However when you try to click on the links, specially on the ICO's submitted to them for approval nothing happens.

When I click in one of the links, as Bloomberg or Forbes, I expect the article will mention AMLT. As it is not the case I stop reading the rest, and the token sale does not inspire to me any confidence.

Luven argues it is an ongoing project, with a unique cancer diagnostic technology. But if it is so, why do they need a cryptocurrency? To fund their project they say. Nice. Taking a look at their wthitepaper

Rentberry seems at least more serious than many of other ICOs. Through its platform tenants will bid for properties in rental. The main problem is that if successful, it will mainly benefit landlords,

I will no comment on the idea of a real estate platform where tenants bid for properties and the highers offer wins the contract. Nice for landlords! But the question is: how anybody could invest money

It's a good idea. Renewable energy plants could be funded by investors buying tokens. With these tokens you could later buy energy produced by the producers. But some simple questions remain unanswered:

"It uses a sophisticated yet transparent algorithm to analyse a trader’s performance and then automatically creates a portfolio of different traders around the globe for the investor. From then on,

The documents included in their site seem more serious than others, but still there are many doubts. They argue they will become a new system for wealth management investing in cryptoassets. But for doing

They argue they will "connect fiat-currencies, exchange listed cryptocurrencies, and unlisted cryptocurrencies in one system". The idea could be interesting, but you still have alternatives to

Reading their white paper: "Bankera is building a digital bank to last" Building a digital bank that has not yet obtained any banking license. And I like the sentence "to last". Thanks.

They say it is a established company with current results. They argue you could consult their financials. This is the only information I have found: To be honest, and without judging if it is a good investment

Today with an idea and a whitepaper you could obtain million of dollars through an ICO. Does i make sense? Probably not. Of course there will be success stories, but in my opinion the success rate would

I have read the Crypterium white paper : and to be honest, I have not been able to find the answers to my doubts: -How are the $45 mill. of funds obtained through the ICO used for? -They argue you could