this forum is supposed to be for debating proposals, not slinging insults at people like you are 5 years old. This is a really bad look but I'm going to come out and say that you don't care probably. Please

I'm sorry but people getting what very few packs they do in rewards, does not stop them from buying packs they want. You literally need thousands of packs to max out decks and reducing rewards is not the

this would only serve to create a larger gap with the top players in the leagues because they would then be able to face the accounts that are in champion but do not have the decks to be there. The way

i am usually in the top 10 of diamond every season and i welcome this change. the top 4 spots is the same people every season. in diamond the top 2 is always the same player with 2 accounts, every single

What people are not understanding with this is that there is already a 3rd party market for this that also charges 5%. With that in mind, why would you not want it burned instead or partially going to

Congratulations btw and thanks for the prompt reply. Initially I was against the hiring but seeing more and more interaction from you, it seems we got the right person for the job. It's a shame you can't

Could it not be proposed to make an exception to the 100k dec cost for proposals coming from this entity in regards to official Dao buisness related ones? While this helps with dec control through burning

this had potential if you would have just included a indefinite revenue share as a equity stake for the dao taking part in the funding of your startup. i guess the 100k dec was worth it in terms of advertising

not the splinterland devs doing this...

this is not the splinterland company.

where do you get 60+ hours a week? its literally probably 3 hours a day if that worth of work load.

Clayborn seems like a awesome dude from what I have seen but 60k is insane. this is not a full time job, also we need to get real life info on him. As many have said before, this could be done for half

i think this would have a better impact if the cost remained the same but a promo like we saw with chaos legion for a card instead. the salty bear got the gears moving, we need another event like that

I voted no and its because like most others have said. It will end up like it was before bots became accessible to the masses. What really grinds my gears is that we have been screaming about bots for

the people on the side of getting more revenue to the dao are against this. because burning rw is directly taking money from the dao in the long run. the ones who want prices to rise are in favor of burning

glad someone sees that, the dao gets 100% of proceeds but this proposal takes away 90% of that. it is crushing the dao funding that this brings. who cares how long it takes to sell out. its taking this

even though 100% was supposed to be dao funds. you are essentially robbing the dao for short term (hopefully) price increases. Makes no sense unless you are trying to push rebellion out the door which

found one of the botters. cry harder.

It is in the best intrest of the community and the game though. Once sps distribution ends, the DAO is responsible for funding rewards in regards to the game itself. So the bigger the DAO coffers become,

Why are you so against the DAO being rewarded for its liquidity services? It takes the risk so it should be rewarded. Your example of distribution also counters your point. The distribution for the LP