By 'trading if appropriate' are you referring here to maintaining the peg? Yes, if the market HBD price is below $1, it will attempt to buy HBD or convert and if the price is above $1 it will attempt to

The old posts by me explain it.

There is no HDB in an interest bearing account having to do with the stabilizer. The stabilizer receives it, converts it if appropriate, uses it for trading if appropriate, and then sends it back when

@dalz has posted reports

It's not an actual cost, it all gets returned. The only amount left in the account is staked HP that comes from @hbd.funder comment votes, which is continually powered down and returned at the maximum

You have to look the comment section, not top level posts.

The stake comes from rewards on the daily hbd.funder comments. Half arrives as HP.

The staked HIVE is powered down at the maximum rate by the bot and then used for trading and returned to DHF.

Somebody would need to hold the coins, increases counterparty risk.

The stabilizer gets post rewards. You can support it that way by voting for the daily comments posted by hbd.funder It doesn't really need a source of funding. The stable coin works to some extent even

Thanks for doing this arcange. I'm voting in favor. BTW, the stabilizer continues to operate without DHF funding because it gets post funding via @hbd.funder comments and occasional other posts people

This isn't "pay", it's just a source of working capital. The funds are all returned to the DHF, usually with a profit.

There are no two voters who can approve anything. Blocktrades has 30 million votes and the next tier has about 5-6 million, and there are only a few of those. At a minimum it would take 5-6 of the largest

A good reason is that there may well be situations where spending more than a fixed percentage of the market cap per year is beneficial or even necessary. For example, consider a situation where a major

An investor who can vote to release tokens from the DHF on their own, for the purpose of damaging the price, would be almost twice as large a stakeholder as blocktrades and that assumes that no other

Obviously the community is not capable to manage its own economy with the tools available. I would argue, rather, that it is doing exactly what stakeholders want and have voted for. That it isn't want

With all due respect, the algorithms, including how DHF budgets payouts to develop the ecosystem, have always been public, and if you didn't understand how it could result in a larger supply of HIVE, that's

Originally the exchanges that listed STEEM (HIVE predecessor) all listed SBD (HBD predecessor) as well. It was much easier to trade in and out of the stable token.

Savings is about 80% of the total (not including HBD stored in the DHF fund, which is excluded from most of the calculations).

Why is it an injustice? Yes people have been building and working for years, but that hasn't been very successful. If some new blood comes along and changes the trajectory for the better, why should the