As I responded earlier, these authors have a right to know what is happening. It's him or them. If it's misinformed, how about correcting the record rather than making a statement with no evidentiary support?

Yes, I agree with that.

Hopefully, one that will create a better site where people can feel free to post their great content.

If you call that spam, then you are bought and paid for, buddy. Read the post. I named them for a very good reason. They need to see what's happening here. It's him or them.

We need to stop the cannibalism and all of the justifications. It's absurd.

When the communities get here, will you be crying then about how people are using their votes?

Not your sock puppet, I'm guessing. Trolls with tails (or trails)?

But in this case, the police are looking out for their own self-interest. That's what governments do.

You laid it out in plain sight and gave them the rope to hang themselves. My, are they taking the bait.

You were looking for a reason to slam Gavvet? Ha. That should be somewhere in the dictionary near the definition of troll. Let's see you try something positive on this site for once, rather than tearing

Honest discussions? Give me a break. You've dismissed everything that is not self-serving to you and the curation rewards you earn from voting @tombstone and trails on all of your posts and many of your

You got me there and I'll admit it. Nice of you to have done that song, thank you. I guess it made the rewards on those other posts worthwhile, too.

Fair enough and thanks for mentioning it. Personally, I find that to be a very sleazy practice (using dozens of votes from people who have entrusted you with their voting power) to make it look like they

@steemed has another good response to your previous critique, which I will link here. It seems that you would prefer to socialize the free market and tell accountholders how to use their voting power (which

And you voted the Wingz comment with your trail instead of this rather less flattering part of the tree. So it looks like that one has 65 votes. Steem Guild members have NEVER been that sleazy. You are

Says the guy who has sucked out 10's of thousands of dollars from Steemit's reward pool for posting a few selfies with your celebrity friend and videos of songs that you have published elsewhere. Where

It's an economy. You somehow want to make it a socialist state and dictate what others can do with their voting stakes. These people are working hard and those who have justifiably accumulated large SP

Interesting that you cut off the list at # 10. Guess who is # 13? That would be @ats-david who upvotes himself on every post (in addition to upvoting many comments to make it look like others agree with