You should consider including what amounts we are talking about, or at least a link where people can easily review this.

A lot of cards seem to be flat out better than existing cards. I get that you want the new cards to be attractive, but that seems a bit extreme. Especially the summoners are just flat out better by a huge

DEC is just as liquid as SPS, I would argue even easier considering a lot of SPS is staked. It is just as easy to buy as SPS and credits are even easier. If there is not enough DEC in circulation SPS will

How does it benefit everyone? From what I can tell it does nothing other than create (or rather enhance) a short-term pump because it puts a sort of discount on buying CA packs with SPS. We will burn less

I am trying to find the advantage for the ecosystem to do that, since effectively, less SPS would need to be burned to mint DEC. If people spend the same amount of DEC (on CA, wild pass, whatever), less

Apart from the minimum 1 DEC rental price floor having to apply to the season rental cost and not per day for this to make sense, I think this completely eliminates the "I want to give this card a

Hi to the Scholar and Scribe Community. :) Maybe I should lose a few words about the game. If I had to give it a category, it would be a text-based MMO rogue-lite RPG. You can read about the thoughts behind

In the end you ask for lower burn rates, at the benefit of the DAO, which delays SPS burn and subsequent value increase at the cost of the DAO. Let me explain. I can see where the idea is coming from,

Is it an option to make some of the supposedly so complicated land code open-sourced? I guess not but I want to ask, because frankly, land back-end can't be that complicated and frontend, while the UI/UX

There is always incentive to stick with your league if you want fair battles against cards of your level.

Neither is really good. Now it is just mayhem and before it was limiting to where you should play and penalizing you for playing in higher leagues than your cards should allow. But if the split is again

I like the idea of limited entries, but I think 12h cooldown is too low. 2 entries per day when there are on average 4 tournaments per day seems too much, especially assuming that not all players can join

While I do agree with the assessment that soulbound is close to web2, I don't think it has no place in a the game. I would disagree that (bot) extractors are killed, if an opportunity arises to extract

So basically what you suggest is turning reward cards into a web2 version of the game. I mean, I would like to see that but with ghostcards not with reward cards. What do you think about the limited unlock

If there would be a way to unlock a specific card I would agree, but like this you just get screwed by RNG and then good luck losing a ruleset because you lack the perfect card for it. Looking at you Kulu

Counter proposal. Elimination of time-sensitive pricing and delayed unlock periods by introducing quantity limits for unlocking of reward cards. The proposed system by Matt to unlock soulbound cards is

What the proposal is not saying, and probably should be updated in somehow, is that the DAO will have to get used to tapping income streams rather sooner than later. Eventually the SPS mint will stop and

You can't draw a linear correlation between amount of cards and value of cards. A card will lose value through other factors too, not just quantity. You should be aware of plenty of very strong cards in

So basically we would have a shop for DEC, one for vouchers, one for glint? How does that make sense? Glint would basically be untouched by this solution so we can disregard the glint shop, but DEC and