If hyper inflation ever occurs though the debt becomes worthless. Why do you think the Chinese have stopped buying our debt? In a few years it will probably not be worth anything.

Another problem is peoples lack of understanding of economics. Thousands of years ago the only of people that were rich were that way because of exploitation of others. Economies change and now most people

Another problem that feeds into this is the ideas of post-modernism. They believe it does not matter what someone else was trying to say, only if they are offended. So they end up not worrying about what

Most people don't really think about it that much so they just accept what they are told. The more you study it the more you realize how stupid it all is. Unfortunately only Anarchists and Geographers

I think the sadder commentary is that people will actually watch it. It is just stupid. Now if you had the "I am going to suck milk up my nose and blow it out of my eye" challenge, that is some

I was agreeing with you until the end of the article. I guess because the term Master has multiple meanings. If you meant it in terms of a Master/Servant relationship then I could agree with you. The reason

Are you still going to be able to get on steemit after you move?

I think you do a good job of describing anarchy. The one thing I think you could do better on is religion. You try and say all religion is the same and is just God telling people what to do. While there

I don't know if you realize this, but you are making the same basic argument that Thomas Hobbes made in 1651. It is one that most people in favor of liberty are familiar with and have already rejected.

I usually get a response more like "But who will build the roads?". Maybe because I go with a "we don't need government" argument instead of "I think anarchy is good"? Anyway,

So you said "almost all forms of social media". I am guessing that steemit is one of the few you are not against? Personally I like it more because people are much more respectful on steemit.

I guess it depends on how badly you want to keep the state out of your marriage. If you really have some deep seated fundamental objection to the state being involved, then don't do it. However, one important

I don't understand your assertion that capitalism and anarchism are incompatible. Anarchy means without rulers, and capitalism means the voluntary exchange of goods and services. Do you think you need

I don't think we need a social contract, but I think it's important to understand why contracts work. So if someone breaks a contract then what? You sue. But what if you win and the other person ignores

To start out I agree with you that in a perfect world all interactions would be voluntary and there would be no government. However, we don't live in a perfect world. You had a lot of good examples, but