Is SparkDEX still going to be a set of pegged assets built on BitShares, or is the plan now to make it an entirely separate network?

Spam and vote buying like this are harmful to the platform. More explanation of why here:

Communism is not the same as socialism. Communism is collective ownership with no state, while socialism is state ownership supposedly on behalf of the collective. Socialism is a hack used to approximate

Thanks for the update. Any interest in adding support for account creation for new users who don't already have an EOS account to pay from? I'd like to see a BitShares<>EOS bridge or gateway with

I've always just run the BitShares interface locally instead of pulling it from someone else's server on demand. I'd recommend at least doing that if you're working with enough value to be worth it. Ideally

"Hackers have full access to domain and SSL, so it’s not secure to use openledger domain even if it’s url is highlighted as trusted. There are phishing activated." If they don't use the service

Additional source, OpenLedger on Facebook: Just trying to confirm that it's actually the website that's compromised, not the account reporting that the website is compromised...

Source?

I think this meme is a legitimate criticism of the degree to which many people who identify themselves as anarcho-capitalists have underdeveloped standards for original appropriation of property and what

POW requires trust in the community of block signers also, which in most cases means a few large mining pools and farms. Delegation and apathy are not unique to proof of stake, and it's best to design

I think DPOS resolves the nothing at stake problem quite satisfactorily. Witnesses certainly have something at stake and will destroy their reputation and forfeit their positions if they sign conflicting

This is both heartbreaking and infuriating, but people need to hear these stories. Thanks for sharing, and stay strong.

Those who give unjustifiable orders or requests are guilty of fraud. Those who kill in obedience to those orders are guilty of murder, or arguably of manslaughter in some cases. By ordering another person's

Because money is the unifying means of exchange, it's the point at which conflicts between different values become apparent. No one actually loves money for its own sake; they love it for the flexibility

Thanks for the explanation, that makes much more sense. It's certainly dangerous to be objectified by those who see themselves as authorities, and labeling is a tool they can use to ease that objectification.

Labels are just words, and they're useful for communicating your thoughts and beliefs to other people. Refusing to share your ideas may be an effective way to defend yourself from having your ideas challenged,

Anarchy means "no rulers". As such it's synonymous with the popular idea of equal human rights and fully compatible with equality under law. Every real crime is an instance of some people

You begin by saying you disagree, but the rest of your post sounds entirely aligned with Spooner's statement (you should include the quote). Law defines acceptable behavior, and requires that all lives

Even without hacked data sources there could be some ambiguity as different data sources fall under political sway to report meaningless 'official' rates:

Sort of. Steem SBD was partially copied from BitShares MPAs, but they tried to make it a simplified version with no direct user initiated issuance. In doing this they removed the price ceiling, which is