Hey, Gareth! Long time no see! I replied via email.

As I said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. PSI is at odds with everything we understand about physics and the way the brain works, so it needs a working theory that makes testable

Thanks

If it's not decommissioned it'll be a waste of even more funds.

It's not a bias. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. A replicated study is not enough to demonstrate new physics. There needs to be an explanation and prediction of other phenomena.

This is nonsense. It would require new physics to be true, which means the evidence needs to be ironclad, and we're talking a sample size of 10 for a binary outcome, using subjective descriptions that

An excellent post, but I will be surprised if we are ever able to make tokamak fusion economic. As far as I can tell it's a technological dead end. I think Polywell is far more promising as a technology.

Listening to Emma Channing talk about token sales, I've realized that the regulatory situation is actually much worse if a token is NOT a security. This is why people say that crypto is not really legal