I'm confussed. This proposal and it's justifications reads two ways for me, one " we cannot afford to dedicate capital to land as we do not see a retun to our bottom line by doing so, please pay for

works if we do not spend it. WHat is going to prevent a dump by the DAO? No value base is created unless it's transacted? The base argument reads to me " we want money so let us keep burned coins"

Yes keeping you guys happy is a good thing. I cannot imagine participating in the SPL ecosystm without you guys. You get my vote!

Well the value is in the rarity but the fun is in the single and last time I checked games should be fun!

Great Article. I wonder what the threshold is for " small projects" my guess is a 40m collective market cap would not count as small but it is no ETH. My bet is in 6 months most crypto project

Yeah the whole "D" in DAO good point. I guess i was seconding the Dev's view but the DAO is " Decentralized" by definition so fair point. To emphasise I love your idea as a "

I agree with Dave that there is nessisary first step before using a " tax". Liscences would disecentivise but if we have seen anything about the nature of bot farms its the low friction scaling