Due to a bug regarding personal claims in the game, console commands can be used instead. Though, such commands need the character ID.

A very well put forth argument, and I must say, you have convinced me. Thank you for your comment.

Well, it is. Property is by definition exclusive to its owner. And the only market/political system which honors property (and its exclusiveness) is absolute capitalism. Only in such a system are all property

Capitalism is the practical conclusion to absolute property rights. If no person can use another's property, without that owner's consent, you have the ethical framework which concludes, in practice,

Remember, mental ill people are being kidnapped, held hostage and force fed drugs for their own good! If they were to act freely, they could end up being kidnapped, held hostage or force fed drugs!

There's a second, and stronger, argument to be made in favor of helicopter rides. The only rights humans can have, are exclusive property rights. Only humans, that recognize others have property rights,

If any files had any "game-breaking" info, they'd be destroyed by now.

not in the top 50

Definitions are needed to understand such a topic, as the word "extreme" can be highly subjective. Extremes might not always be "good," but if they invade no rights, they must be allowed.

"extremes are not good" That really depends on the definition of extreme. If you mean radicalism, it depends on the ideology. If you believe that rape is bad, and should be outlawed, while living

cough millions died by the jihad cough

At least it's private, it can be boycotted more easily.

Sharia and laws provided by the Koran (or any other piece of Scripture,) are by definition, totally arbitrary. The enforcement of such laws, or morals, is a direct invasion of people's right to their person

Islam being good for "women's rights?" Women are individuals, and have as many rights, as any other individuals: to life, liberty and property -- none of which Islam guarantee (especially not

It's not a problem with republicans per say, but more so of collectivists. It comes in all flavors racism, nationalism, Marxism/communism, etc. It's the complete ignorance of the individual, and his power

You defend freedom without defining it first. If freedom is not having your rights -- to person and property -- invaded, then you can't have a government, as that would be anti-freedom. Laws are arbitrary

"No person may tell you how to act, in any place." What if I tell a person not to invade my property?

"jail cells for conspiracy to secession" I agree with @rvanstel, I don't get your name either. Jailing someone, for wanting to be governed by someone else than the Spanish government seams very

"defend democracy and real freedom" Democracy isn't "real" freedom -- it isn't even freedom. Freedom, defined as not having your rights -- to your person and property -- being invaded,

It isn't that we don't want Trump as the president, we don't want any president.