I think Adam broke down the wall you are hitting in the argument fairly well.. I feel you are misinterpreting language choice for the will at which he hopes to set in creating his executive order. Whether he be the "custodian" of the federal government, or whether the electoral process abides by libertarian principles (or if adam thinks elections are scams) is irrelevant when the core of Adam's argument implies he wants to figure out how to get to peaceful eradication of government. He repeatedly stated his plan was not perfect, and he is open to resolving the multitude of imperfections, and he hopes to start a conversation about the immorality of government.

Though the idea of complete abolition of government through an executive order is absurd I think Adam is likely open to a better idea if there is such. I don't think quoting his past contradictions says anything about the overarching sentiment of what he wants to accomplish.

Thanks for debating, I enjoyed listening!