Beauty is easy to appreciate but difficult to define. As we look around, discover in objects and sights in the laughter in the kindness of But asked to define, run into difficulties. Does beauty have an independent objective identity? Is it universal, or is it dependent on sense perceptions? it lie the eye of the beholder? -We ask ourselves. A further difficulty arises when auty itself not only by its presence, but by its absence as well, as when we are repulsed by ugliness and desire beauty. But ugliness has as much a place in our lives as beauty, or may be more as when there is widespread in a society. Philosophers have told us that important part of life, but isn't ugliness part of life too? And if art has beauty as an important ingredient, can it confine itself only to a Can art is not Poets and so, have provided an answer by incorporating both into their work. In they have often tied beauty to truth and justice, so that what is not beautiful assumes a tolerable proportion as something that represents some truth about life. John Keats, the romantic in his code on a Um Beauty is truth, truth beauty, by which he means that truth even if it's not pleasant, becomes beautiful at a higher level, Similarly, what a is beautiful forever remains true. Another meaning, in the context of the Grecian Urn an art object is that truth is a condition of art.
Would you like to add some points?
Then comment And also Follow me