When you put the questions into a computer, you're putting that human function in yourself, you're doing that search yourself. So it's not really... I mean, it's a sort of middleman that doesn't need to be there. It's what... You can do a basic search and you can get a load of questions, but you can do your due diligence because it gets things wrong.
And there was the point about critical thinking, the literacy crisis that's going on. A lot of people don't want to read anything. Some people may have difficulties reading things, but I think as humans, we can think about how we can make things accessible and easier to understand.
I don't... I'm not convinced that AI does that for us. It still gets things wrong. I mentioned weeks ago that I blocked Grok.
Anyone thinks... I did this petalese to somebody once. I shared... I've been waiting for a video game in the past. It came and someone put in my replies, hey Grok, could we have a coin from you to celebrate this? Okay, blocked him straight and told him to delete it.
Because I just had zero tolerance for him and the development of that particular machine. It gets so many things wrong. People have to ask it, is it true? And it's also presenting a point of view.
It presents a point of view that can sometimes be insidious. It can send you misinformation or it runs on disinformation and you can find something, but you've still got to have the due diligence. You've still got to look at a few other sources for verification, because otherwise it's one word against somebody else's.
And this is one of my problems, one of my many problems with AI, because it's not whether you're pro or anti-AI. It's a reality. So the real question must be, who must it serve? How is it going to serve us? Sorry, that just hit a fork.
