Solar Cycle 25
Global warming is a difficult topic to debate openly, the emotions that are generated in the public when they defend the global warming narrative run high. It has almost become a religion and to call it a fraud makes you a heretic. I learnt quite early on in my life that carbon driven climate change was a fraud. I first came to understand this when I was half way through my Masters in Renewable Energy. Much of the program was complicated mathematics and physics in the direction of thermodynamics, fluid dynamics and electronics. But we also learnt environmental studies including the greenhouse effect.
It was at the same time that I was studying that the idea of global warming started to go mainstream. Of course Al Gore took it to a whole new level a few years later. But the concept of carbon driven global warming was relatively new in terms of attention. But I just did not get it.
When I looked at the facts, they did not add up. Manmade carbon dioxide is not much more than a trace element in the global environment. If you look up charts of greenhouse gasses today you will find the majority of charts are showing only manmade greenhouse gasses and yes carbon dioxide is by far the biggest manmade contribution to the greenhouse effect.
But if you look at manmade carbon dioxide, it is a tiny proportion compared to the carbon dioxide produced by nature. To add to this carbon dioxide is a tiny proportion of the greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere. Some charts will illustrate this better.
See how small the proportion of carbon dioxide already in the atmosphere is compared to water vapor. Now lets look at manmade carbon dioxide compared to natures carbon dioxide contribution.
Out of all the carbon dioxide that is produced on the planet, humans are responsible for 5%. The rest is from nature, mainly in the form of warming water, nature living, nature dying and volcanos. Also notice that the second chart is not the carbon dioxide in the first chart it is the carbon dioxide being added to the carbon dioxide of the first chart. It is proportionally very very little compared to water vapour already acting as a greenhouse gas.
It is getting harder and harder to find real data on this topic. The searches are swamped with propaganda charts showing how carbon dioxide is the largest human contribution of greenhouse gasses but not showing carbon dioxides tiny contribution to the greenhouse effect.
If you listen to Al Gore he shows quite correctly that the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere correlates with the average global temperature. Where he is trying to deceive us is by stating that carbon dioxide is driving global warming when it is the opposite. When the oceans warm they release carbon dioxide, when the oceans cool they absorb carbon dioxide. So what is warming and cooling the planet?
The answer is the Sun. The total solar irradiance levels from the sun are not constant, they flicker slightly like a candle. This explains why the earths temperature has never been constant, the earth goes through ice ages and much hotter periods than we have experienced in the last 100 years. This fluctuation happens all the way through history, way before SUVs.
Now I would like to make a distinction here between pollution and carbon driven global warming. Pollution is a terrible thing that humans do to this planet but carbon driven global warming is a lie. It is a lie that is heavily taxed. As if taxing carbon dioxide is going to stop it being produced. Carbon dioxide is a part of nature, plants breath it, we breath it, it is a part of our ecosystem. It should not be taxed anymore than water vapour from your bath.
Now I would like to get to the important part of this article. When I first found out that the globalists were taxing carbon dioxide I thought that this was just more theft like interest payments on fractional reserve money creation. But since then I have come across a scientist called John Casey. Casey is very well respected and is an expert on many topics connected to sun activity. To cut to the chase, his work and others around the world point to a coming period of global cooling. His case is very compelling and I recommend reading his book Dark Winter.
To summarise his conclusions, we are at the end of solar cycle 24 which has seen a reduction in sunspots compared to the previous solar cycles. When the sun has less sunspots the total solar irradiation decreases and the sun warms the planet less. Further to this his historical studies of solar cycles shows that a double peak with the second peak higher than the first indicates a further reduction in sun spots in the next solar cycle.
If he is correct and his work looks good to me. Then we are heading into a cooling period rather like the Dalton Minimum experienced in the early 1800s. This period was very difficult for the people of that era especially if they lived far from the equator, Northern Europe, Northern Asia. The main challenge other than warmth was food production. It only takes a slight drop in seasonal temperature for crops to fail and cause food shortages.
The people that experienced this in the 1800s were not prepared and because of this global warming lie nor are we. There is such control on the climate change narrative today that scientific debate does not even exist in this field, not publicly anyway. It is almost a cult. It is a very dangerous lie and we are already seeing crops starting to fail in Europe with late frosts and erratic weather.
My theory is that this solar minimum cycle has been known for a while by the globalists and they are coving it up so that the coming escalation in food prices will coincide with the collapse of the fractional reserve banking system. If this plays out it would cause disastrous suffering and hardship not only economically but in terms of survival in the worst effected areas. Perfect for a submissive population to adopt regime change.
Monsanto
If the Devil was a company it would be Monsanto. I won’t go into all the details, you can do your own research but Agent Orange, PCB & GMO are what Monsanto is best known for. What I am interested in here is their seed policy. Monsanto has a monopoly on the global agricultural seed supply.
Monsanto makes farmers sign an agreement that they will not save and replant seeds produced from the seed they buy. More than 325,000 farmers a year buy seed under these agreements in America alone. This has created a dependency on the Monsanto GMO seed distribution network. I am really concerned with not only the ability of these crops to grow in a sharp cooling period but also the distribution networks in a fractional reserve banking collapse and the intentions of this devil company its self. They have a long history of killing people.
If Monsanto stopped distributing seeds, no matter what the excuse, we are going to see a global famine. Now I can’t tell you this will happen, but it is a very disturbing dependency when considering all the other things going on under the radar around the globe.
Please study this all yourself with an open mind and come to your own conclusions. Be aware that there is a lot of propaganda and misinformation out there. This is just a heads up. If we do enter a solar minimum period it could last for 30 years. We will adapt. The problem that I am prepping for is the initial realisation period that we need to adapt and the period that it will take to adapt with 7 billion people all expecting food in the shops as normal with no backup supply, potentially no seeds and no idea how to solve the problem for months.