You aren't getting it. Think about how it plays out instead of blindly trying to defend Hive account@dan. Let's imagine you are Alice (not the real person but the account). Alice realizes Hive account@dan has 51% of the hashes and is trying to "censor" her. I have shown that she can push a transaction through with certainty over a finite number of blocks. Let's say Hive account@dan is dead set on killing the chain to stop Alice. Alice sends the entirety of her balance to trex by pushing that transaction through.

Hungry to double her money she tries again after Hive account@dan graciously negates her original spend, then she executes a second (double) spend, maybe going so far as to dump her account on bittrex for the second time and transferring all of whatever she dumped into off the exchange. Alice is now 2x rich and out, Hive account@dan is wasting gobs of money mining a tainted coin.

Who won from this "censorship"?