This type of Spam consists of posting a certain content, and then afterwards "deleting" it to repost it as original content again, replacing it usually with "deleted", "error", "wrong post" or similar phrases. It is usually done when the post was not voted by curators, or the expected autovotes at 5 minutes don't kick in, so its basically a move of "I will repost it until you vote it and delete the previous one to pretend I'm not spamming". All this while usually claiming that they reposted it because they could not see the first post due to a malfunction of the front-ends.
User's Profile / Perfil del Usuario:
@carlagonz/posts
Posts' URL's:
@carlagonz/eng-esp-3-dias-de-celebracion-de-cumpleanos-3-days-of-birthday-celebration
@carlagonz/eng-esp-3-dias-de-celebracion-de-cumpleanos-3-days-of-birthday-celebration-qkqvku
Here we can see the user lying to 
in their Discord server after stopping in to play the victim about being downvoted and them having found what it was about.
As you can see in her explanation, it is the typical one in the beginning of this post, namely: She made a post, she couldn't see the post, so she posted it again. then she found out there were two posts and edited the first one.
Just in case the user decides to erase that statement in Discord (even though it would remain in the logs), here is the same statement on-chain.
Source
Source
The Reality
So here is where we will show you, 100% irrefutably that the user is a repost spammer AND a liar.
Here we have the user posting the first post at 03:35:45 GMT
Here you can see the user editing the first post with minor style edits one minute later at 03:36:54 GMT
You might wonder: How is it that the user was able to edit the first post one minute later if she couldn't see it?????...........
Here you can see the user editing the first post claiming that there had been an "error", that the post was duplicated by mistake at 03:40:54 GMT even before the second post was created
And finally here you can see the repost created at 03:41:21 GMT ....... Voilá
Conclusion
The user claims that she reposted the post because she could not see it in her profile, but the fact that she edited it for style modifications one minute later IRREFUTABLY demonstrates that to be a lie.
Additionally the user edits the first post for a second time, deleting everything and inserting instead that there was a duplicate error, BEFORE THE REPOST WAS POSTED, which demonstrates also IRREFUTABLY that there was no duplicate error.
Bonus Track
As a very hilarious bonus track here we have in the
Here the abuser thanking the white knight for "reviewing the problem", and finally another biased and/or incompetent white knight indicating that he had managed to remove the significant downnvote from the post. Just like the first one, without even thoroughly investigating the case, and taking the abuser's word at face value.
This is Jaguar Force,
Reporting directly from the Jungle.
Onwards!