Thank you for your comment. To rephrase: our aim is to highlight the dichotomy of a democratic voting process, where:
- the vote is about de-listing a project delivering unfair magnitudes
- some are voting against the de-listing with the unfairly acquired magnitudes
Displaying public information makes it accessible. There is no point in contributing to an immutable public ledger if we are going to shun people for making use of these features.
RE: Where did the "keep SourceFinder" voters make their magnitudes?