The age at which a male initially observes erotic entertainment is related with certain sexist demeanors further down the road, as indicated by a group of scientists from the University of Nebraska.
Their review uncovered the more youthful the primary survey happened, the more probable a male was to need control over ladies.
While on the off chance that they were more established, they will probably be sexually wanton.
Of the 330 students reviewed, with a middle age of 20, the normal age they initially observed smut was 13.
The most youthful was just five, while the most established was 26.
The unpublished discoveries were introduced at a tradition in Washington.
Playboy way of life
Lead scientist Alyssa Bischmann and her group asked the men, by far most of whom were hetero and white, when they initially observed porn and whether it was purposeful, unintentional or constrained.
They were then asked 46 questions which measured how they adjusted to one of two behavioral characteristics - looking for control over ladies or sexually indiscriminate conduct and carrying on with a playboy way of life.
They found the individuals who saw porn youthful were destined to concur with explanations that affirmed male strength, for example, "things have a tendency to be better when men are in control".
The specialists were shocked to locate that seeing porn further down the road was related with a playboy way of life, for example, wanting to every now and again change sexual accomplices.
Scientist Christina Richardson said this could be on the grounds that the individuals who were presented to porn early frequently did not appreciate sex, all things considered.
"These men frequently have a considerable measure of execution nervousness with ladies, in actuality. Sexual encounters don't go as arranged or the way they do in erotic entertainment," she said.
On the other hand "the individuals who see porn later, appreciate sex, in actuality, increasingly and in this manner may probably carry on with a playboy way of life".
The exploration, which was displayed at the American Psychological Association's yearly tradition, did not consider how much porn the men watched, the kind of porn or other statistic factors, for example, their financial foundation.
It could likewise have been other identity qualities that decided when the guys were presented to porn.
'Sexually deskilled'
Subside Saddington, sex specialist at relationship bolster supplier Relate, stated: "Smut can and has an effect on numerous young fellows' dispositions to sex.
"The outcome can be that young fellows create sexist mentalities and are basically sexually deskilled."
In any case, Ms Richardson says porn "is not the most advantageous thing for men".
She included that young fellows required "better good examples to grow more solid convictions about manliness".