One does not need to do a deep dive into AI to see the forecasts of increased in productivity due to AI. This is something that is starting to garner a great deal of attention.
As I stated in other articles, my view is AI is not overhyped. If anything, it is underhyped based upon the probalisti potential that we see emerge over the next few years.
For this reason, anyone who is involved should seriously consider the potential of where the fruits of this economic productivity end up.
While a lot is made about X, OpenAI, Meta, and Google, the law of big numbers actually work against these entities. Obviously, the fact they are developing large language models (LLM) is making waves. However, it is likely they become commodities. We are already seeing the moat that some early companies had evaporationg.
A prime example is OpenAI with reasoning. There was an open source, Chinese model that was just released which rivals what OpenAI has on the market. Fortunately for that company, the next generation is due anytime, assuring it will regain its throne.
The issue is that, with so many others out there, it is only a matter of time before the gap closes even more.
Which is opportunity for those who are looking elsewhere.
LeoAI: Easier To 100x Smaller Operation
Where are the potential 100x in AI?
If we look at a company like Mera, we know we are dealing with a force in AI. The issue is the value of the company at present. It has a market capitalization of $1.56 trillion. Can you see this company getting to $156T? We could see a 10x over time but a 100x?
There are going to be some companies that have monsterous market cap. AI is going to generate enormous wealth, some of that finding its way into these types of entities.
That said, we have another path to look at.
When dealing with growth, it is much easier to grow something much smaller. When dealing with a market cap of a few hundred thousand, a 100x is nothing. Of course, it is not easy to do as it is difficult to produce those types of results.
Or it was. AI certainly changes the game completely.
People raise an eyebrow when people mention there will be AI agents, developed by one person, that generate a billion dollars in wealth. This seems absurd. However, it is something that will occur, with a decent frequency.
This is what Leo has to look at tapping into. Due to the fact that it is a paltform, it can build agent and AI services that helps the user base. At the same time, value creation comes from entering the AI realm.
The goal is not to be the next Meta or Google. Instead, it is becoming the "everything app" to those who utilize it. Even with a couple hundred thousand users, that is enough to send value skyrocketing.
Whether it is something like Leo or other projects, there are going to be plenty of opportunities for people to really position themselves well financially. The bigger entities will see massive increases. They will, however, pale in comparison to some smaller operations that master the AI agents and services their users need.