but that a lot of their potential gets lost because there’s no light shining on them. There’s no visibility. And without visibility, there are no measurements

Sure. But the way VP works the work to make them visible isnt on VP but rather on the projects themselves to achieve this. And they havent. Thats simply a fact. And the work allocation on VP will not change. So i have to look at what can deliver results based on obstacles that exist.

Basically, you’re proposing to apply private-sector marketing logic to a public ecosystem.

Why would you say private sector marketing logic breaks trust and damages credibility? How do you see those things being related?

Funds leaving DHF eventually down the line in 100% of cases breaks down decentralized decision making. There is no consensus once funds are given even to projects you might support. Trust breaking and damaging is when results arent delivered.

My company does not promise a borderless decentralized community-driven product

But if it did, where would it be economically more sound to promote this message? In Somalia or EU, US? 😉