So You think You can choose a ruler, ai or not, over Humankind? You who claim ai will run this place. Seriously, Elon, I will rule My crowndom (Self and possessions).
You can follow and worship who/what You choose as long as Your behavior choices are Ethical. As long as You do not break those Laws, I do not care what You choose to believe or do with Your life. If You are caring, I will welcome You, and if You’re nasty, I will avoid You in the future, but I will hold no accusation.
But if You break the three Laws, everyOne else, including Me, has Ethical right to give You Ethical consequences – anything Ethical, We can mete.
We who are Ethical Ones.
Whatever You get Others to consent to, unless it is dealing in Ethics, it does not apply to Me or any Ethical One standing with Me under the three Laws. I do not consent to the whole psychopathic legal/governmafia mess. And the Laws stand on much higher ground than does the sewer that system is.
Any system that pursues the interests of the moneyed cannot be good for Me, so…
Leave Me alone...as a rule, but for when You find restitution for the theft of My interest in the wealth on Our planet and deliver it to Me. That latter I will see if My probabilities that You will are correct. It is the honorable thing to do, but then Ones beneath the beasts will not choose honest honor, and this will be the proof.
I look forward!
Meanwhile, You readers might want to start measuring in Ethics and not that legal system that is grossly unEthical. Withdraw consent from that mess, and work towards returning to Us what is Ours – a share of the wealth on Our planet.
See the links below for more details.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
The Laws of Ethics Stand Higher Than the Legal System (article): @amaterasusolar/the-laws-of-ethics-stand-higher-than-the-legal-system
Nobility is Measured in Ethics, not Lineage or Money (article): @amaterasusolar/nobility-is-measured-in-ethics-not-lineage-or-money
You Are a Multimillionaire (article): @amaterasusolar/you-are-a-multimillionaire
They Don’t Teach Ethics Anymore (article): @amaterasusolar/they-dont-teach-ethics-anymore
Just Stop Consenting! (article): @amaterasusolar/just-stop-consenting
The Lack of Ethics in Food Production (article): @amaterasusolar/the-lack-of-ethics-in-food-production
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.