I did a piece a while back entitled They Don’t Teach Ethics Anymore (linked below). In that piece I wrote the following:
And if the three Laws are Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do, they clearly are above that Human-created mess called the “legal system.” And if they are above the legal mess, why are We not taught them?
Well, it’s clear that if We were taught them, We would see all the unEthical things the legal system does, and there would be far more than Me and the few Others rejecting the legal system wholesale. We would ignore prohibitions, licenses, unscientific demands like any and all “climate change” proscriptions, and other things that profit the legalate makers and screw Us.
It is clear that They (the moneyed psychopaths in control) don’t want Us to grasp that They have eradicated – or are trying to – knowledge that We can stand above the legal system. They want Us to think the legal mess is all there is, so when They make Ethical things like cannabis “illegal,” They can send in paid bullies to arrest anyOne who has it, and We will accept that.
When someOne collects rainwater, depriving Them of the opportunity to demand payment for Their water supply, the bullies can come and toss the collector in the hoosegow.
When someOne does not want to accept toxins (and who knows what else) jabbed into Their flesh, Their freedoms can be bullied away.
When someOne does not want to pay taxes to the governmafia, not wanting to support the wars and the bullying that the governmafia uses the money for, They can be hauled away and held for a decade or more.
When someOne uses a substance that threatens Their profits – like cannabis does (They can’t patent it, and it threatens many industries, from oil, cotton, paper, textiles, and plastics to the pHARMa/mediKILL industry) – the bully brigade can be sent out.
When someOne is homeless, bullies can come and force that One into “shelter” (jail).
When someOne chooses to travel without state permission, even when They have a bond for $100,000,000 to cover potential damages, They can be bullied.
Maybe They will send a bully brigade for Me because I chose My name and the legal NAME is a TRUST. It’s illegal to use a name that is not in Their list of NAMES.
Clearly, this is a short list of things that are quite Ethical – harming no Others (and don’t go on about refusing jabs o’ toxins threatening Others; the whole virus thing is a lie, and so is contagion – neither has been honestly proven to this day, and the lies do promote fear to motivate Us to take Their ghastly brews) – but are illegal. There are many others – My fav is walking down the street with an ice cream cone in Your pocket… LOL!
The point is that We can move upwards, away from that sewer and onto Ethical ground, where We do no unEthical thing – like stealing privacy by trespassing, or spying on One who has given no reason to believe They are committing/have committed a true crime (broken one or more Law).
We do not have to stand subject to rules in place for profit and control.
We can withdraw Our consent and stand sovereign on Ethical ground, responding to that system without creating controversy – “I will be happy to [engage You, do as You say, give You that, etc.] if You prove I am in Your jurisdiction.” Conditional acceptance of the offers They make do not create controversy.
When We have withdrawn consent, there is no proof We’re in anyOne’s jurisdiction. They have nothing to use to prove We are.
Yes, They may choose to be bullies, putting Them in dishonor. But when We do nothing They demand, making counteroffers with conditional acceptance, there is little else They can do. Even in court, if We’re dragged into one, We can say… “I will be happy to engage this court if You prove I am in Your jurisdiction.”
Do not make the mistake of thinking We can just vote harder and the interests will change. All the governmafias are for-profit corporations owned by the same Ones, and “voting” is just a practice They keep to continue the illusion We have a say in Their system. They appoint all the People that “represent” Us.
It does take “balls” (whether One is male or female) to stand sovereign, creating no controversy, but if We do not grow some and make a stand as sovereign of Our Selves and crowndom (that which We own), to be sure, most of Us will be dead, and the remaining Ones held in 15 minute corrals, eating bugs, constrained by social credit scores and CBDC’s, hooked up like Borg…
…to be used as Their servants, slaves, sex toys, and sacrifices.
Is this the future You’re willing to let happen? Or will You stand sovereign with Me, aiming for far better? Promoting consent to Ethics, and protecting Self and Others from bullies?
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to My work for Humanity:
They Don’t Teach Ethics Anymore (article): @amaterasusolar/they-dont-teach-ethics-anymore
Scoping Out the Terrain (article): @amaterasusolar/scoping-out-the-terrain
Legal and Lawful (article): @amaterasusolar/legal-and-lawful
Calling a Legalate a Law (article): @amaterasusolar/calling-a-legalate-a-law
Sovereignty is a Hard Sell (article): @amaterasusolar/sovereignty-is-a-hard-sell
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): @amaterasusolar/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical-ground
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.