I came across the meme below on MeWe (a social media site that, so far, does not seem to censor, despite being of Chinese origins – so far…), with the following commentary by the poster:
BTW, in the US it's legal to give livestock and poultry vaccines and still have it lawfully labeled Certified Organic.
Well, not Lawfully. Legally.
I had a thing or two to say about it!
I stand on Ethical ground, and that labeling is fully unEthical. I do not consent to a system that could allow such deceit. You can say that any One has an obligation to research, but if We did that, all We would be doing in Our lives is researching, with an enormous backlog.
When it is accepted that "organic" means just that, to "legally" say, without all efforts to let be known the change, and getting informed consent from the Ones that will be affected, can anything like this be considered Ethical.
In other words, when something is labeled “organic,” the whole process must come from nature. That is what that designation was sold to Us as meaning. You can’t besmirch the process at any level with unnatural input and still be organic.
And to expect Us to “research” things that could change daily – and in the legal system it is theoretically possible to change things up every single day! – is fully absurd. UnEthical on its own. Just imagine having to research every day to see if They changed things up – if You can find the data in the mountain range of legalates – before You ingest Your meal!
No, when something like the definition of “organic” has changed in the legal system, it is unEthical to quietly just move on with the new definition. Legally, of course, that is perfectly fine. And this is the foundation of the problem with the legal system.
Too many think that the legal system is the be-all and end-all of justice, that it is needed at all. But when We grasp that We are expected to know all legalates (ignorance of the “law” is no excuse) and that the number of legalates “on the books” is fully unknown, the absurdity of that system becomes stark.
How can anyOne reasonably be expected to know the content of all the legalates when the mere number of them is anyOne’s guess?
To be Ethical, when a definition is changed in that scummy system, announcements must be made where the majority will see and grasp what the new definition is. In clear and non-obfuscated terms. But the legal system makes it legal to change things up that affect whole swathes of People without notification but the proceedings themselves.
It’s up to Us to “pay attention” to all that system’s machinations – as if any of Us could.
When We stand in aggregate on Ethical ground – under the three Laws of Ethics only – eschewing that ghastly and unEthical legal system, Our plight on this planet will vastly improve. No longer at the whim of the psychopaths, who in theory could make it a “legal requirement” to sacrifice Our firstborns for population control, or any other unEthical thing.
No longer will We be arrested for doing Ethical things – traveling without some “license,” leaving a 15 minute prison, collecting rainwater, or any other Ethical thing They might decide to make illegal. No longer will the legalate (“law”) create injustice when applied to Ones who are creating no problems.
No longer will Some have the power to send bullies to ensnare Us for doing Ethical things that counter what They want.
Do You have what it takes to stand sovereign under the three Laws, ready to arrest Any who choose unEthical behavior (break the Laws)? Or, if You cannot, call for aid in doing so from anyOne who can? Or will You just go along to (more or less) get along in this ghastly and unEthical legal/governmental system?
Let Me know where You stand – on the high ground under Ethics, or in the sewer that is that legal/governmental system.
As My regular readers know, I ask for no money as payment for My work for Humanity. I ask for payment in shares. Please, if You feel My work has value, share with ten or more People. This will be the only way the information is spread.
Links to info:
The Simplicity of Ethics (article): @amaterasusolar/the-simplicity-of-ethics
The Three Laws of Ethics (article): @amaterasusolar/the-three-laws-of-ethics
Calling a Legalate a Law (article): @amaterasusolar/calling-a-legalate-a-law
Ethical Labeling vs Legal Labeling (article): @amaterasusolar/ethical-labeling-vs-legal-labeling
Join Me as a Sovereign Here on Ethical Ground (article): @amaterasusolar/join-me-as-a-sovereign-here-on-ethical-ground
Do You Have the Balls? (article): @amaterasusolar/do-you-have-the-balls-ruykps
Signature:
Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia
Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change
The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella
My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.
I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"
When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.
From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).
I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...
I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.
And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.
Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?
And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.
So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.
Love always.