I posted an argument for and against a topic today, but in truth it did not feel right at all. I was not really challenging my beliefs and realise it would be far more fruitful for me engage in a very real debate with myself. The reason I chose the one argument for and one argument against set up, was because I wanted to leave my opinions and conclusions out of it, so that people could make up their own minds about their feelings and not be swayed by me. But, I think the best approach now would be to, when choosing a subject, write in detail why I feel the way I currently do about it, and then pick it apart line for line in a following post, and to repeat the process until I have arrived at a resolution I feel good about.
So I'd not advise you bother to read the first two posts. There's little self scrutiny if any in them. Tomorrow I aim to do it in the way I just mentioned, which I think will be far more worth a read and more likely to yield questions that lead to meaningful answers.
I would feel quite dishonest to continue this conversation with you without informing you that I am . I no longer have access to that account, but when I created this one, I sought through my followed list on there for my favourite blogs so that I could populate my home feed.
Can I ask though, why you asked, if I am a native English speaker or not? Do I not seem like one? I suppose I do have a particularly dated style of writing.
RE: @skitz - An introduction