Right when I thought that there could be nobody more annoying than Brittni De La Mora, I stumbled across this one British influencer named Rachel Oates who goes way beyond being annoying. In case you don't know who Brittni De La Mora is, I described her in my previous article.
Look at it this way. Ms. De La Mora is someone you would feel sorry for at worst. However, Ms. Oates is someone you would just like to slap across the face. She believes that she is holier than thou.
In her video below, Ms. Oates takes what started out as a loving, close-knitted cross-generational teenage-adult marriage, for a lack of a better description, and treats it as a heinous crime. This is how deranged Ms. Oates is. She's clearly not grounded in reality, to say the least about her. Watch her video below.
Rachel Oates Provides One Hour Of Nonsensical Drivel About A Woman Who First Dated A 21-Year-Old Man When She Was 15 Years Old And Married Him 2 Years Later
I can't really refer to the marriage that Ms. Oates describes in her video above as a cross-generational teenage marriage at its outset, because a 15-year-old girl's relationship with a 21-year-old man and marriage to him two years later is more of a Romeo-and-Juliet romance than anything.
Okay, Ms. Oates. I completely get that you're not an avid fan of Roman Polanski, but don't go making the husband in that same marriage you describe out to be the next Donald James Smith or John Couey. It's not as though this man was a 91-year-old pedophile who snatched a toddler off a playground to do the unthinkable. Both parties in this same couple were in love with each other and wanted a future together.
1. Rachel Oates' False Narratives Disguised As Words Of Wisdom
Rachel Oates is a good example of someone across the pond shooting crap out of her mouth while believing that her British accent somehow makes her the word of the wise. When Isaac Mueller first met his wife, Kendra Mueller, Isaac was 21 years of age and Kendra was 15 years old. They got married to each other two years later.
Isaac and Kendra currently own a thriving business in Tennessee. They have four wonderful kids together. I would have to say that they have a successful marriage and a commendable family life, even though they were not exactly Johnny and Sarah Tanner of the Tannerites on YouTube in light of their age difference at the outset of their relationship. Oh, well. Nobody is perfect.
Ms. Oates points out that Kendra Mueller has an Instagram account, and Ms. Oates insists that Isaac Mueller has groomed Kendra from day one and that she has been romanticizing about it since day one inasmuch as Isaac and Kendra were each on opposite sides of the legal age line at the outset of their relationship. My response is each party being on opposite sides of the legal age line at the outset of a relationship doesn't make it grooming unless a prepubescent child was involved.
In Kendra's videos, nobody is romanticizing about grooming. Ms. Oates, on the other hand, delivers her video in such a way that she turns grooming into a conspiracy theory.
Ms. Oates is not even from the United States and cannot fully understand how life works in my nation. She obviously lives a sheltered life from her London apartment.
Lenore Skenazy? If you're reading this article here of mine, let me remind you that you once defended a 21-year-old man who was branded as a registered sex offender for having sexual intercourse with his 15-year-old girlfriend as described in your article. I need you to put Rachel Oates in her place and give her an attitude adjustment.
Fortunately, Ms. Oates never accuses anyone of being a pedophile in her video above. Nonetheless, in that same video, she still goes as far as to accuse Isaac of being a child molester.
Perhaps Ms. Oates doesn't believe that the Muellers would be legally capable of suing her from the United States for defamation of character, because she lives in the United Kingdom. However, let's remember that Ms. Oates' paychecks for her YouTube videos come from the United States. Therefore, the Muellers could bring a lawsuit against her and garnish her earnings from her YouTube videos. It happens all the time in the civil court system here in the United States.
Ms. Oates doesn't have the faintest idea of what she is talking about in her video. She's not qualified to make such degrading determinations about Isaac. She has never even met him or Kendra. Yet she believes that she knows more about them than they know about themselves. She insists that she knows them better than they know themselves.
Ms. Oates should never be taken seriously. She's a real piece of work for sure. She reminds me of the lyrics of the song below.
The Song Titled "Jackie Blue" By The Ozark Mountain Daredevils
Regardless of whether Ms. Oates believes that Isaac is a child groomer and a child molester, she cannot deny that Isaac is a much better person than Levi Johnston. Levi Johnston forcibly raped Bristol Palen back when she was 16 years old. Levi Johnston psychologically abused Bristol Palin from that point on and weaponized their own son to make problems for her.
Never mind that Levi Johnston was the same age as Bristol Palin. Same-age relationships for adolescent girls don't automatically make everything all good except in Ms. Oates' deluded mind.
What did Isaac do to Kendra? He fell in love with her, and then he married her two years later. He has been a good husband to her and a good father to their four children. If Ms. Oates still contends that Isaac is a child groomer and a child molester, then she is the one who needs to be locked up rather than him. She belongs in a mental institution.
Kendra has never screamed "rape" against her husband. Therefore, the authorities would never have any reason to make any arrests. Kendra and Isaac went through the proper channels to get married and make their relationship all legal despite that Kendra was a minor at the time that they got married.
Kendra never claimed that Isaac "groomed" her in any manner back when she was a teenager. She's not claiming to be a victim. Ms. Oates is trying to put words into this woman's mouth, and Ms. Oates' actions against Isaac and Kendra are character assassination at the most.
Kendra has a happy marriage with Isaac, and she has four kids. What do you have, Ms. Oates? You're merely another ignorant cat lady with tattoos on your body. You need to get a life and let others live their own lives.
Ms. Oates is not an expert on grooming, child molestation, criminology, and the likes. Instead, she is a conspiracy theorist who plays on the insecurities and knee-jerk reactions of her viewing audience.
Now, let's just say that Ms. Oates were to get her way and the authorities arrested Isaac and locked him up for all the false allegations that Ms. Oates makes against him. What do you think would happen? Well, Kendra's four kids would be robbed of their father. Kendra would be struggling financially, because the business that she and her husband are currently operating would probably go belly up.
The only people that would have anything to gain from Isaac going to prison for a lengthy period of time would be some overzealous prosecutor and the despotic police officers that would be involved in his arrest and conviction. It wouldn't stop there.
Once Isaac got out of prison, he, Kendra, and their four kids would likely be struggling financially on an income of $11,000 a year inasmuch as Isaac would be on the sex-offender registry. They might all have ended up homeless in that event.
Can anyone really call any of this good? For this reason, we must see radical feminist misandrists like Ms. Oates for the dangerous people that they are. Moreover, she probably has never been to the United States, so she would have no understanding of the struggles that Americans endure because of the housing crisis here. Her actions would do more harm than good to Kendra. That is, if any good could come out of them, which would be highly unlikely.
Ms. Oates? I am no more of a fan of Christian fundamentalism than you are, and I've done nothing to hide the fact that I am an agnostic whenever I have published an article on this writing platform. I have no problem with you criticizing "trad" wives in general. However, if religion gives Kendra solace, then let her do what makes her happy. It's ironic that I should have to be the one to defend the Muellers.
When my great aunt was 15 years old, she married a 24-year-old man with whom she had fallen in love. They had a long, happy marriage. There was no grooming or molestation involved in their matrimony. Her parents (my great-grandparents) were British.
My first cousin first met his late wife when he was 30 years old and she was 15 years old. He married her a year later, and I can attest that he never groomed or sexually molested her. In fact, shortly after they were married, he protected his 4-year-old stepchild from a pedophile. I'd hardly ever accuse him of being a child molester, because conventional wisdom holds that one child molester doesn't protect a child from another child molester.
During my first year of college, I became friends with a freshman named Bobby. When his parents got married, his mother was 15 years old and his father was 22 years old. From the way that Bobby spoke to me about his parents, I always got the impression that he was a love child.
I never met Bobby's father; but from what he told me, his father was not a sexual predator of any kind. If Bobby's father had gone to prison for statutory rape, I can be sure that Bobby would not have had the quality of life that he did.
Ms. Oates? Since you are so dead set on believing that every adult man over the age of 18 who has ever fallen in love with a teenage minor or has dated one is a child groomer and a child molester, let me give you something to think about. Why don't you make a video about John Walsh being a child groomer? After all, he was dating his current wife, Revé, when she was only 16 years old and he was comfortably in his twenties.
Oh, wait a minute, Ms. Oates. John Walsh is the co-founder of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, so you'd be shooting yourself in the foot in that event. Too bad.
I have a better idea, Ms. Oates. Why don't you accuse Corey Feldman of being a child groomer and a child molester? After all, back when he was 18 years old, he was dating Drew Barrymore, who was only 14 years old at the time. He first pursued her in a non-Platonic manner when she was only 10 years old.
Oops! I have to remember that Corey Feldman is supposed to be the ambassador of the war against Hollywood "pedophilia." Well, he can't exactly get the definition of pedophilia right, because he believes that teenagers are still young enough to be victims of pedophilia except when it's teenagers that he himself wishes to drag into bed with him.
Ms. Oates? Kendra is not attempting to normalize anything on her Instagram channel. She's merely trying to live her life and show the world that self-proclaimed child advocates like yourself are not always right about your preconceived notions regarding cross-generational teenage marriage.
Throughout her video, Ms. Oates names and quotes obscure "experts" to support her claims against Isaac, so to speak. However, her video amounts to nothing more than a load of self-righteous propaganda that relies on her sensationalism and faulty information at best.
The kind of "experts" that Ms. Oates seems to like are ones that have dollar signs in their eyes and are looking to profit off of books about child sexual abuse. They don't care about the truth or about the greater good. They only care about the amount of money they can make off of their witch hunts against innocent individuals like Isaac.
Ms. Oates? Isaac never groomed Kendra into anything. You're the one who is grooming your viewing audience with your false narratives and unfounded claims.
Ms. Oates? The reason that age-gap relationships exist is because of hypergamy, and you haven't denounced hypergamy anywhere in your video. Therefore, you have no moral high ground to pass judgment on Isaac.
I find it praiseworthy that Isaac was operating his own business when he was 21 years old. It shows that when Kendra was 15 years old, he had more to offer her than some prospective deadbeat teenage father à la Levi Johnston who may have happened to be the same age as her or only one or two years older than her.
Ms. Oates? You don't know whether there was any kind of power imbalance between Kendra and Isaac at the outset of their relationship. For all you know, Kendra may have been Isaac's first love. In that event, he would have been functioning on the same wavelength as she was.
Ms. Oates? Kendra and Isaac's relationship and marriage are not wrong. You're wrong! Their type of relationship and marriage are common and accepted in nations that have lower statutory ages of consent than the United Kingdom does. I can name a whole host of nations in Europe where the statutory age of consent is either 14 or 15 years old.
Ms. Oates? You go by the assumption that if something is taboo and illegal in a given culture, then it must be evil altogether. That assumption of yours is weak.
Ms. Oates? In contrary to you and in accordance with the American Psychiatric Association ("A. P. A."), it is normative for a 21-year-old man to have non-Platonic feelings for a 15-year-old girl and even to reciprocate her flirtations. Not everyone lives in your make-believe world of age-appropriate perfection and wholesome purity.
The argument over whether a 15-year-old girl is really a child is highly debatable. According to medical science, a 15-year-old girl is a young woman, so put a sock in it, Ms. Oates.
Isaac did not take advantage of Kendra except in your deluded mind, Ms. Oates. You talk as though Isaac was a 72-year-old man who pulled a 6-year-old girl into his car and took her off somewhere to rape her.
Ms. Oates? I pray and hope that a 14-year-old boy never rapes you, because you will be eating your own words in that event. His parents might even wrongfully charge you with statutory rape if he lies to the police and tells them that you seduced him.
Ms. Oates? Grooming is not the same thing as forcible rape. A 15-year-old girl is considered to be a consenting adult in many European jurisdictions and in many other parts of the world.
Ms. Oates? Reading a sob story about a 15-year-old girl's relationship with an adult man going sour is not going to convince me or anyone of reasonable intelligence that Isaac ever groomed Kendra. You're nothing more than an unwelcome guest in Kendra's digital space on the Internet.
Ms. Oates? You are a fool to believe that a girl as young as 13 or 14 years old cannot have power over an older man. You need look no further than the incidents involving Alisha Dean back in 2008.
Ms. Oates obviously believes that older men are to blame for all of teenage girls' problems, when reality has it that underage boys commit the majority of rapes and sexual assaults against female teenage minors inasmuch as they have the most access to them. She is like a nasty clone of Shanley Kane.
Ms. Oates? Did it ever occur to you that Kendra and Isaac may have just so happened to have been in love with each other after they first met? Oh, wait a minute. I must remind myself that you obviously have never been in love, so you wouldn't understand any of that. You simply default automatically to your false accusations of grooming and child molestation whenever you spot a couple like Kendra and Isaac on the Internet instead of treating every situation like this one on a case-by-case basis.
Ms. Oates' biggest weakness in her arguments in her video above is that she fails to differentiate between teenagers and prepubescent children. Therefore, her arguments fall apart quickly.
Notice how Ms. Oates absolutely loves words like "groomer," "groomers," "grooming," "predator," and "predators" when she describes men who don't meet up to her so-called standards of age-appropriate behavior. She is the face of MeToo-movement fraud. You can tell that Ms. Oates is a misandrist by the way she makes snide remarks about men.
Ms. Oates? Teenage sex is not child molestation. Duhhhhh!!!! Isaac never seduced Kendra. He did not abuse her in any manner. Isaac and Kendra consummated their love and started a family together within the confines of matrimony. They have their happily-ever-after, and you're jealous of Kendra for acquiring the things in life that you may never acquire.
"Statutory rape" is nothing more than a legal construct. It is not an act of sexual brutality like forcible rape is. Ms. Oates makes "statutory rape" out to be a heinous crime. Ms. Oates is so full of manure.
Some of you out there may be old enough to remember a scenario that was presented on the American soap opera General Hospital in which Luke Spencer violently raped Laura Baldwin when she was a teenager. Eventually, both Luke and Laura fell in love with each other and got married. The entire string of events triggered all sorts of uproar among its audience.
The late Leslie Ann Charleson, who played Dr. Monica Quartermaine on that soap opera, even talked about leaving the show in an interview inasmuch as she was very disgusted with the writers. Later on, the writers of that soap opera worked it into the story that Laura finally admitted that she realized that Luke had raped her before they got married to each other.
Well, Ms. Oates tries to make Kendra and Isaac's marriage out to be a Luke-and-Laura thing, when such accusations on her part cannot be any further from the truth.
Ms. Oates thinks that she's psychic and that she can get inside of Kendra's head and know all her feelings. The only trauma that Kendra may have suffered is from listening to Ms. Oates' constant crap.
Now, I will not deny that Ms. Oates' rhetoric about grooming and sexual molestation would apply to prepubescent children. However, it has nothing to do with teenage sexuality.
Ms. Oates? Who are you to tell a married couple like Kendra and Isaac that their relationship has been wrong from the beginning of it? You have this one misconception that if Kendra had met and fallen in love with a boy her own age back when she was 15 years old, her life would have become a bed of roses. Well, you're wrong.
So many years ago I came across a news story about a 16-year-old boy who threatened his 15-year-old girlfriend with a knife if she had refused to become pregnant with his baby. After the authorities caught him, the judge merely sent him to some camp for troubled youths where he was able to utilize its recreational facilities all day long and play sports. Not much of a punishment for him.
In contrary to what Ms. Oates claims in her above video, power imbalances in relationships do not always cause harm. They're very common in hypergamous relationships. The entire concept of "textbook grooming" is a figment of Ms. Oates' deluded and twisted imagination.
Ms. Oates is literally taking something beautiful and sentimental as what Kendra and Isaac have had with each other for a while now and she is misconstruing it as a cold, calculated, barbaric act of sexual brutality. Ms. Oates is the one who needs professional help rather than Isaac.
In her video above, Ms. Oates uses fear-mongering tactics in her narratives to manipulate the biases and insecurities that people in the Anglosphere have over teenage sexuality. Fact has it that Isaac never molested any child and Kendra was not a child when he first met her.
If we all really wish to wage war against child abuse and the likes, we need to ignore idiots like Ms. Oates and persuade California Governor Gavin Newsom to grant the Menendez brothers (Erik Menendez and Lyle Menendez) full gubernatorial pardons. Ms. Oates' narratives are merely the ravings of a deranged misandrist who is clueless about real sex crimes against children.
You are wrong, Ms. Oates. False accusations of sexual assault are not rare. Lawyers absolutely love civil molestation lawsuits, because they can line their pockets with them. MeToo-movement fraud is rampant in the United States and throughout the rest of the Anglosphere.
In contrary to what Ms. Oates claims in her video, the bar for the conviction of sex crimes is not unusually high in the United States. In fact, it is quite the opposite. Below is a video in which Norman Michael Achin explains the reality of how someone is guilty until proven innocent in an American court of law whenever someone is being tried for a sex crime, especially one involving a minor.
Norman Michael Achin Describes The Cracks In The American Court System That Favor Predatory Prosecutors In Sex Cases Involving Minors
In her video, Ms. Oates cheers on all the busybodies that tried to stop Kendra's relationship with Isaac. Like those same people, Ms. Oates needs to get a life.
In her video, the analogies that Ms. Oates makes to support her arguments are horrible and prove nothing. Frank Oz could direct a remake of the 1997 film titled In & Out and end the film with a scene in which everyone in a school auditorium claims to be a groomer to disgust the school administrator who endorses a rumor about someone being such a person. Perhaps Ms. Oates could play the role of that school administrator.
In her video, Ms. Oates actually has the audacity to snipe at homeschooling and then she suggests that that type of education made Kendra vulnerable to manipulation and "grooming." Well, Isaac never manipulated or groomed Kendra. Nonetheless, because Ms. Oates brought up this same topic, I've got something to direct her way.
The reason that American parents homeschool their children is because of reports of child abuse, sexual molestation, and bullying in the public school system throughout the United States. This point proves that Ms. Oates is completely clueless about issues relating to the protection and safety of children.
Ms. Oates has to be certifiable in the head to equate what started out as a Romeo-and-Juliet relationship to a case of child molestation. It's as though everything is her way or the highway, and nobody can contradict her without her getting offended from it.
Ms. Oates? You're entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts. In your comments about Isaac, you have clearly rewritten history in a way that is defamatory to him. You insist that your opinions are actual facts, but they're merely suppositions on your part with no real merit to them.
Ms. Oates? Stop picking on Kendra's grammar and spelling. The United Kingdom has an illiteracy rate that is two percent higher than that of the United States. At least that was the case the last time I checked.
Ms. Oates speculates that if Kendra had attended public school, Isaac would have likely thrown a monkey wrench in her social life. Ms. Oates? You don't know that for sure.
After spending a whole hour demonizing Isaac into a make-believe child molester, Ms. Oates provides a rebuttal to Kendra's online statement that Isaac never groomed her. Kendra knows Isaac better than Ms. Oates does. In fact, Ms. Oates doesn't know Isaac at all. Therefore, Kendra's statement would carry all the weight in the world, whereas Ms. Oates' opinion carries none.
So, as it stands, Ms. Oates apparently contends that there are high-functioning child molesters out there and that Isaac has to be one of them. Her so-called logic is as stupid as saying that every 7-year-old girl fantasizes about being raped by an 81-year-old man. It makes absolutely no sense on her part.
Ms. Oates? Take your grooming wand and shove it where it best fits. You do not speak the gospel truth. You are not even an authority on this subject matter. Because there appears to be no single definition of grooming set in stone, I feel inclined to dismiss grooming as a conspiracy theory, unless we're describing the victimization of a small child under 11 years old.
2. The Comments Section Of Rachel Oates' Video
In the comments section to her video, Rachel Oates had mostly the usual love fest of self-proclaimed child advocates, self-appointed psychiatrists, and the likes sniping at every man over 18 years old who has ever fallen in love with a teenage minor. You can clearly see that she aimed for her comments section to be an echo chamber mirroring her own dogma on the topic of teenage marriage.
Rather than having a healthy debate, Ms. Oates got belligerent with YouTuber @johnnonamegibbon3580 inasmuch as he disagreed with her. She obviously believes that anyone who disagrees with her has creepy, predatory views.
If a group of 13-, 14-, and 15-year-old gangbangers asked Ms. Oates for a ride somewhere, she would be naive enough to let them in her car under the assumption that they couldn't do any harm to her; and she'd be learning the hard way how wrong she was. After they got through raping her, she wouldn't think of people that young as being children.
The most intellectually bankrupt comment came from a YouTuber named @Artemis-athena. Therein he or she posted:
All age gaps are predatory. I just saw a dude who is 80 with a 20 year old son.. no not adopted. Imagine the poor woman who got groomed by that creep..
YouTuber @Artemis-athena? No 80-year-old man is going to be seeking your seal of approval for his marriage and fatherhood. Fact has it that if a man wants to father children in his fifties or sixties, he's going to marry a woman who is still young enough to bear healthy children with or without the approval of society or Puritans like you. Therefore, there will always be an age gap in that event.
YouTuber @Artemis-athena? There are same-age relationships that are much more predatory than any age-gap relationship that may have been less than perfect. Are we going to accuse everyone in the world of grooming? You're simply another conspiracy theorist like Ms. Oates.
YouTuber @Artemis-athena? Bo Derek married John Derek when she was 19 years old and he was 49 years old, and their marriage stood the test of time. On the other hand, Macaulay Culkin married Rachel Miner when they were both 17 years old, and their clown-car marriage only survived for two years and was legally dissolved after four years. Therefore, you're not right about age-gap marriages being predatory.
YouTuber @Artemis-athena? You're obviously another one of those hotheaded, self-righteous do-gooders who believe that every man needs to be a Tony-Danza/Macaulay-Culkin centaur or he doesn't meet up to your expectations of a real man. Well, nobody really cares what you think other than yourself, so crawl back under the rock from whence you came.
Another post that stands out in my head is one by YouTuber @FlurinRyffel in which he states therein:
Back when I was a teenager (a long, loooong time ago), I never understood why men came to my school to flirt with teenage girls. It grossed me out, and when I became an adult, the thought never crossed my mind. I actually preferred older women, and my first relationship was with a woman 9 years my senior. These predators need to be pegged for what they are: cowardly weak "alpha" men who are scared of women their age and are willing to abuse children to boost their tiny egos.
Give me a break, YouTuber @FlurinRyffel. If you've always liked older women, you're not going to understand what really causes a young adult man to gravitate toward a teenage girl who is not yet voting. You're generalizing about them. Did it ever occur to you that perhaps these men wish to experience that one first love with a girl who has never had a boyfriend? They're not going to find that from an older woman.
And no, YouTuber @FlurinRyffel, these men are not afraid of women their own age. They simply get tired of all the hypergamous garbage that their female peers throw at them whenever they do try to form a romantic relationship with them.
Also, YouTuber @FlurinRyfell, they're not predators who abuse children. Many English dictionaries define a child as a boy or girl before puberty, so you cannot equate these men to child molesters. If you did, you'd start having to call deadbeat teenage fathers child molesters as well.
It's interesting how whenever a man barely in his twenties falls in love with a 14- or 15-year-old girl, then there are always people like Ms. Oates and YouTuber @FlurinRyfell falsely accusing him of being a child molester.
On the other hand, whenever a 14-year-old boy violently rapes a 13-year-old girl, these same self-proclaimed child advocates somehow find it politically incorrect for anyone to accuse that same boy of being a child sexual predator because of his proximity in age to his victim. I simply cannot make sense out of that same school of thought.
Fortunately, there were a few YouTubers here and there that actually had a brain when they posted comments in the comments section to Ms. Oates' video. For example, therein YouTuber @coramcdonnell2900 posted:
As long as she has written consent from her parents when they were married, their marriage is legal, I work in marriages. Also this was the first and last video I think I’ll be watching on your channel, I was super excited to watch but the rambling, whining as a source of commentary, no time stamps, random stats instead of just human commentary, unsure at when the video starts. I just can’t, I’m sorry babe.
YouTuber @coramcdonnell2900? You hit it all right on the button. I couldn't have said it better.
Many YouTubers therein whined about it still being legal for underage teenagers to get married in certain state jurisdictions of the United States. Well, here is some food for thought. In South Africa, it is perfectly legal for a girl to get married at 14 years old with no restrictions on the age difference between her and her husband as long as her parents consent to it and she goes through the proper channels.
What do South Africans think about the notion of a 14-year-old girl being able to get legally married in their nation? They have much bigger fish to fry, so they don't lay awake at night dwelling on it. They're more concerned about their small children under 11 years old falling victim to cannibalism. Below is a video about it.
Willem Petzer Describes The Atrocities Of Children Falling Prey To Cannibalism In South Africa
Ms. Oates? If you want to do a real video about the victimization of children, why don't you travel down to South Africa and piece together a video about cannibalism and how it has caused the needless deaths of many children? The trend of teenage girls getting married before they're old enough to vote will always exist in many parts of the world. However, there is no reason that any child should fall victim to cannibalism.
Teenage sex is teenage sex regardless of whether it is legal or illegal. On the other hand, nobody needs the law or society to convince them of how evil and unconscionable cannibalism is when it involves the horrific murder of innocent children.
3. The Truth About Rachel Oates' Phony Faҫade As A Demagogue
It turns out that Rachel Oates has developed somewhat of a disreputable image among other YouTubers. There is a YouTuber named DDJ who has a channel named Misandry Today, and he has a mouthful to say about Ms. Oates and I don't mean anything positive. I honestly think that he goes softer on her in his opinion than I do in mine. In any event, here is his video.
YouTuber DDJ Exposes Rachel Oates For The Lying Misandrist And Radical Feminist That She Is
YouTuber DDJ brings up a whole host of important points about Ms. Oates. First of all, she has a history of mental problems. Therefore, she is nobody to accuse Isaac Mueller of anything unethical or immoral. She also has very few friends. Hmmm. I wonder why that is so. I guess that would become a problem for her in view of the fact that she makes enemies left and right.
Second of all, YouTuber DDJ points out that Ms. Oates does poor research. Therefore, all these insults she makes about Isaac in her video further back herein are exactly insults rather than words of wisdom. YouTuber DDJ exposes her as a men-hating radical feminist.
Third of all, Ms. Oates defends sexual promiscuity. Therefore, she has no moral high ground to go accusing Isaac of being a child sexual predator. She needs to clean up her own doorstep before she can grow a moral compass, so to speak.
YouTuber DDJ states that data supports that the more sexually promiscuous a woman is, the more likely she'll falsely accuse a man of sexual assault. In her video further back, Ms. Oates insists that very few such accusations are ever false. What a joke she is. She is wrong.
According to YouTuber DDJ, Allison Saunders was a predatory prosecutor in the United Kingdom who set out to railroad men on false rape allegations whenever a complaint of that nature came across her desk. Hmmm. Why didn't you bring her name up in your video, Ms. Oates?
YouTuber DDJ reports that violent chaos has been going on in the United Kingdom, at least in 2018 when he recorded his video above. I'm sure it hasn't gotten any better.
Meanwhile, Ms. Oates is obsessing over a marriage between a 17-year-old girl and a 23-year-old man that has shown to be happy and prosperous. Radical feminists like Ms. Oates remain quiet about real crime, but they have no problem meddling into marriages like that of the Muellers. They have an agenda that cares nothing about the greater good.
Ms. Oates? Admit it. You are no Katie Hopkins or Diane Sawyer. Your school of thought is openly flawed, and you're too proud to own up to it.
All right. I don't agree with YouTuber DDJ about Adil Rashid necessarily having groomed a 13-year-old girl he met on the Internet merely because he was 5 years older than her. He and that young girl were both teenagers when they had sex with each other, and nobody forced anyone into anything they didn't want to do. Therefore, as far as I'm concerned, the judge did right in his criminal court case by not sending this young man to prison.
In any event, because YouTuber DDJ has brought up this news story from so many years ago, allow me to elaborate on it in connection with my article's topic. To the best of my knowledge, Ms. Oates has never made a video about this incident that happened in her own nation, whereas she found the time to make a video to slander Isaac for marrying Kendra when Kendra was only one year shy of the age of majority.
When you get down to the bare facts, Mr. Rashid was 18 years old when he had sex with a 13-year-old girl whom he had recently met online. On the other hand, Isaac did the honorable thing and married Kendra once he found out that she was pregnant. Yes, he was 23 years old and she was 17 years old, but he wasn't looking for casual sex as Mr. Rashid was. At the end of the day, Ms. Oates cared nothing about the true moral characteristics regarding the story about the Muellers.
4. Final Thoughts
Dunces like Rachel Oates are precisely why the so-called crime of "statutory rape" should be downgraded from a strict-liability offense to an intent offense.
Grooming should not be an automatic given in a criminal court case based merely on an accusation. A prosecutor should have to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt in a court of law before a conviction can be secured. Dangerous individuals like Ms. Oates make it necessary that such safeguards be put in place in our judicial system.
I suppose Ms. Oates is going to come back at me and gaslight me. My response to those actions of hers is that she can fire away at me.
I'd be happy if Ms. Oates were to make a video in response to this same article here of mine. Of course, I would publish a rebuttal to her video in any event. If she wants to go back and forth with me, I have no problem with it. I'm game.
Any propaganda that you hear or read about on the Internet about the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex of the frontal lobes of the brain not becoming fully developed until 25 years of age is junk science at best. I would not be the least surprised if the prison-industrial complex has funded research studies to produce this same junk science.
Ms. Oates is dangerous to humanity in that she wishes to turn the United States into some kind of prison-loving society, and she's not even an American. Before you put any stock in her false narratives about "grooming," read the online publication titled The Paradox of Statutory Rape by Russell L. Christopher and Kathryn Hope Christopher from beginning to end. You'll then realize how inaccurate and even mendacious Ms. Oates' statements about the Muellers are in her video further back herein.
Isaac Mueller may have gone a little younger than most American men his age would have dared to have done in finding a wife. However, in contrary to Ms. Oates' preconceived notions about him, I would hardly accuse him of being another Dahvie Vanity.
Ladies and gentlemen? Let me inform you that the United Kingdom is no longer a vacation destination. If you're an American and you're thinking about booking a trip to Europe, skip over England at all costs.
Go to Budapest, Hungary instead. The people there are more polite than the British are. They're more receptive with you whenever you don't completely agree with them. Everything there costs less than it does in England. The people there even speak better English than the British do. LOL! Their food tastes better than the food in England does. Unlike the British, the Hungarians will make you feel welcome in their country.
England is falling apart. There have been reports on YouTube that the United Kingdom will eventually cease to exist in the not-too-distant future. The Hungarians keep the buildings and infrastructures up in their capital - Budapest. London is decaying like an apple rotting from inside. England somehow has a propensity to puke out raving idiots like Ms. Oates. Nobody should give them any relevance.
The British criticize the way Americans and Canadians speak English, when British people's syntax and diction leave so very much to be desired. All they know how to do is belittle others and tell lie after lie about people they don't even know. Ms. Oates is the proof in the pudding to that fact.
This article is copyright-protected.